Suppr超能文献

在人员配置得到加强的改良治疗社区中管理MICA患者。

Managing MICA clients in a modified therapeutic community with enhanced staffing.

作者信息

Carroll J F, McGinley J J

机构信息

Project Return Foundation, Inc., New York, NY 10003-6935, USA.

出版信息

J Subst Abuse Treat. 1998 Nov-Dec;15(6):565-77. doi: 10.1016/s0740-5472(98)00005-1.

Abstract

To determine how effective a modified therapeutic community (TC) with enhanced mental health staffing would be in treating mentally ill chemical abusing (MICA) clients in a "mainstream" program, Project Return Foundation, Inc. (PRF) conducted a treatment outcome evaluation study involving 438 residents. Client admissions were screened by mental health specialists for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV; American Psychiatric Association, 1994) diagnoses and then placed into one of three diagnostic groups: non-MICA; general MICA (not requiring psychotropic medication); and, severe MICA (requiring psychotropic medication). Clients were administered the Tennessee Self-Concept Scale (TSCS; Roid & Fitts, 1991) after admission and at 6-month intervals thereafter. Results indicated that: (a) the three diagnostic groups were significantly different at initial TSCS testing, with the non-MICA group evidencing the least lowest measures of self-esteem and lesser degrees of psychopathology; the severe MICA group had the lowest psychological scores; (b) all three diagnostic groups showed significant improvement in their TSCS scores after 6 to 7 months of treatment; (c) covariance analyses observed that the three diagnostic groups did not significantly differ at 6 month testing when the initial TSCS testing was taken into account; and, (d) significant gender differences on several TSCS scales were noted, in that women scored lower than men in self-esteem and higher than men in psychopathology. Research limitations and clinical observations are considered.

摘要

为了确定一个配备了更多心理健康工作人员的改良治疗社区(TC)在“主流”项目中治疗患有精神疾病的药物滥用者(MICA)的效果如何,回归项目基金会(PRF)开展了一项涉及438名居民的治疗结果评估研究。心理健康专家对入院患者进行筛查,以确定其是否符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(第四版;美国精神病学协会,1994年)的诊断标准,然后将其分为三个诊断组之一:非MICA组;一般MICA组(不需要精神药物治疗);以及重度MICA组(需要精神药物治疗)。患者在入院时以及此后每隔6个月接受一次田纳西自我概念量表(TSCS;罗伊德和菲茨,1991年)测试。结果表明:(a)在最初的TSCS测试中,这三个诊断组存在显著差异,非MICA组的自尊测量值最低,精神病理学程度也较低;重度MICA组的心理得分最低;(b)在接受6至7个月的治疗后,所有三个诊断组的TSCS得分均有显著提高;(c)协方差分析发现,在考虑最初的TSCS测试结果后,这三个诊断组在6个月测试时没有显著差异;(d)在TSCS的几个量表上发现了显著的性别差异,即女性在自尊方面的得分低于男性,在精神病理学方面的得分高于男性。文中还考虑了研究局限性和临床观察结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验