Gramellini D, Piantelli G, Delle Chiaie L, Rutolo S, Vadora E
Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Parma, Italy.
J Perinat Med. 1998;26(4):293-301. doi: 10.1515/jpme.1998.26.4.293.
Oligohydramnios, with its extremely varied aetiology, is associated with unfavourable perinatal outcome, especially if detected during the second trimester. Amnioinfusion has recently become widely used for the diagnostic, prophylactic and therapeutic management of oligohydramnios, although as yet no incontrovertible proof exists of its advantages over conservative treatments. This study analyses our preliminary experience regarding antepartum amnioinfusion, aimed at clarifying its diagnostic and therapeutic role and its relative harmlessness. The outcomes of 80 pregnancies with oligohydramnios were analysed, comparing the 35 amnioinfused cases with the 45 conservatively treated ones; the cases were classed as second or third trimester, according to when a reduction in amniotic fluid was diagnosed. In the amnioinfused group, latency was longer; this was only significant in the third trimester (a median 14 days vs. 5 days; p < 0.05), no difference occurring in the incidence of spontaneous abortion, intrauterine death or preterm delivery. Analysis of neonatal outcomes at the second trimester shows a lesser incidence of neonatal deaths (5% vs. 33%; p < 0.05). The number of neonates discharged after amnioinfusion at the II trimester (3 out of 4) constitutes 75% of live births, compared with only 25% (2 out of 8) among those not undergoing amnioinfusion in the same period. Cumulative analysis of neonatal complications in the two treatment groups revealed no significant differences; cases of serious neurological damage at the third trimester were more frequent in the non-amnioinfused group (7 out of 27 vs. 0 out of 15; p < 0.05). There were no differences between the two groups (amnioinfused and not) with regard to maternal parameters of phlogosis analysed (leukocytosis, hyperpyrexia, CRP C-reacting Protein). In conclusion, our experience shows that within the limits of the small number of samples here used, amnioinfusion, involving few maternal or fetal risks, is advantageous as to perinatal mortality and morbidity. We thus confirm it as one of the few available methods in the active management of pregnancies affected by second-term and incipient third-term oligohydramnios.
羊水过少病因极为多样,与不良围产期结局相关,尤其是在孕中期检测到羊水过少时。羊膜腔灌注近来已广泛用于羊水过少的诊断、预防和治疗管理,尽管尚无确凿证据表明其优于保守治疗。本研究分析了我们关于产前羊膜腔灌注的初步经验,旨在阐明其诊断和治疗作用以及相对安全性。分析了80例羊水过少妊娠的结局,将35例接受羊膜腔灌注的病例与45例接受保守治疗的病例进行比较;根据羊水减少诊断时间,将病例分为孕中期或孕晚期。在接受羊膜腔灌注的组中,潜伏期较长;这仅在孕晚期有显著差异(中位数14天对5天;p<0.05),自然流产、宫内死亡或早产的发生率无差异。对孕中期新生儿结局的分析显示,新生儿死亡发生率较低(5%对33%;p<0.05)。孕中期接受羊膜腔灌注后出院的新生儿数量(4例中的3例)占活产儿的75%,而同期未接受羊膜腔灌注的新生儿中这一比例仅为25%(8例中的2例)。对两个治疗组新生儿并发症的累积分析未发现显著差异;孕晚期严重神经损伤病例在未接受羊膜腔灌注组中更常见(27例中的7例对15例中的0例;p<0.05)。在分析的炎症相关母体参数(白细胞增多、高热、C反应蛋白)方面,两组(接受羊膜腔灌注和未接受羊膜腔灌注)之间没有差异。总之,我们的经验表明,在此处使用的少量样本范围内,羊膜腔灌注涉及的母体或胎儿风险较小,在围产期死亡率和发病率方面具有优势。因此,我们确认它是积极管理受孕中期和孕晚期早期羊水过少影响的妊娠的少数可用方法之一。