Suppr超能文献

[环孢素(山地明)与新山地明在肝移植中的比较性随机前瞻性多中心研究]

[A comparative randomized prospective multicenter study of Sandimmune vs Neoral in liver transplantation].

作者信息

Roy A, Grant D R, Kneteman N M, Tchervenkov J I, Levy G A, Tan A, Hendricks L

机构信息

CHUM, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Ann Chir. 1998;52(8):716-21.

PMID:9846420
Abstract

Despite two decades of use, there are limited data on the best way to administer and monitor cyclosporine for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). The present study was undertaken: 1) to establish the safety of a new formulation of cyclosporine, Neoral, 2) to determine if treatment with Neoral will improve the results of liver transplantation and 3) to study the relationship between pharmacokinetic parameters and clinical outcomes after OLT. A double-blind, randomized, comparison of Sandimmune and Neoral was conducted at 5 Canadian centers in 188 consecutive adults undergoing OLT. Patients were induced with intravenous cyclosporine (CsA) then switched to Neoral or Sandimmune. Dose adjustments were made daily, or as needed, to reach a target trough CsA level (C0) of 350 ng/mL in both groups. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed on days 5, 10, 15 and 30 after transplantation. The Neoral group stopped intravenous CsA earlier (p < 0.0001), and these patients required a lower median daily oral dose (p < 0.01) to maintain comparable trough CsA levels. Five Sandimmune patients, but no Neoral patients discontinued the study because of the inability to reach target trough levels of CsA within the prescribed time (p < 0.05). At 4 months, there were no differences between the two groups with respect to patient survival, graft survival or rejection-free survival. The incidence of serious adverse events was also similar and did not correlate with CsA profiles. The Neoral group had a higher area under the drug concentration curve (AUC) and peak CsA levels (Cmax). There was a correlation between freedom from graft rejection and both AUC and Cmax at days 5 and 10 post-transplant. In contrast, there was a poor correlation between C0 and graft rejection. In summary, Neoral appears to be safe and well tolerated by patients. Cmax and/or AUC maybe better markers for monitoring cyclosporine based immunosuppression after liver transplantation.

摘要

尽管环孢素已使用了二十年,但关于原位肝移植(OLT)中环孢素的最佳给药和监测方式的数据有限。开展本研究的目的如下:1)确定新型环孢素制剂新山地明(Neoral)的安全性;2)确定使用新山地明治疗是否会改善肝移植结果;3)研究肝移植术后药代动力学参数与临床结果之间的关系。在加拿大的5个中心对188例连续接受OLT的成年患者进行了一项双盲、随机、新山地明与山地明(Sandimmune)的对比研究。患者先静脉注射环孢素(CsA)诱导,然后改用新山地明或山地明。每天或根据需要进行剂量调整,以使两组的目标谷值CsA水平(C0)达到350 ng/mL。在移植后第5、10、15和30天进行药代动力学研究。新山地明组更早停用静脉注射CsA(p < 0.0001),并且这些患者维持可比的谷值CsA水平所需的每日口服剂量中位数更低(p < 0.01)。5例使用山地明的患者因无法在规定时间内达到目标谷值CsA水平而退出研究,但新山地明组无患者退出(p < 0.05)。在4个月时,两组在患者生存率、移植物生存率或无排斥生存率方面无差异。严重不良事件的发生率也相似,且与CsA的血药浓度曲线无关。新山地明组的药物浓度曲线下面积(AUC)和CsA峰值水平(Cmax)更高。移植后第5天和第10天,无移植物排斥与AUC和Cmax均相关。相比之下,C0与移植物排斥之间的相关性较差。总之,新山地明似乎对患者安全且耐受性良好。Cmax和/或AUC可能是肝移植后监测基于环孢素的免疫抑制的更好指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验