Bell E J, Kaidonis J, Townsend G, Richards L
Department of Dentistry, University of Adelaide, Australia.
Aust Dent J. 1998 Oct;43(5):362-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1998.tb00190.x.
The aim of this study was to compare the shape of exposed dentinal surfaces caused by abrasion and erosion with a view to developing a diagnostic clinical test. The study material consisted of 80 natural teeth and 129 dental models obtained from Australian Aborigines known to display considerable dental abrasion due to their diet, and dental models of 37 Caucasians diagnosed with dental erosion through detailed history and dietary analysis. Polyvinyl siloxane impressions were obtained of all occlusal surfaces with dentinal scooping in both the 'abrasion' and 'erosion' groups. All impressions were sectioned buccolingually through the deepest point of the scooped dentine, and then the profiles were photocopied at x2 magnification. The breadth and depth of dentinal profiles were measured to an accuracy of 0.1 mm, enabling ratios of depth:breadth to be determined, and the position of the deepest part of each scooped surface was recorded. The mean depth:breadth ratio of scooped dentine was significantly greater in the Aboriginal natural teeth (0.19 +/- 0.06, mean +/- SE) than in the Aboriginal dental models (0.15 +/- 0.04). Both Aboriginal natural teeth and models with abrasion showed significantly smaller ratios (p < 0.05) than the Caucasian models showing erosion (0.33 +/- 0.07). Furthermore, in the abrasion samples, the deepest region of the scooped dentine tended to be lingually placed more often in maxillary teeth but buccally placed more often in mandibular teeth (p < 0.05). These results indicate that scooped dentine on abraded occlusal surfaces of teeth displays significant differences in shape compared with that caused mainly by erosion.
本研究的目的是比较磨损和侵蚀导致的牙本质暴露表面的形状,以期开发一种诊断性临床测试。研究材料包括80颗天然牙和129个牙模,这些天然牙和牙模取自已知因饮食而有明显牙齿磨损的澳大利亚原住民,以及通过详细病史和饮食分析被诊断为牙齿侵蚀的37名高加索人的牙模。对“磨损”组和“侵蚀”组所有有牙本质挖舀的咬合面制取聚醚橡胶印模。所有印模均在挖舀牙本质的最深点进行颊舌向剖切,然后将剖面以2倍放大率进行 photocopied(此处原文可能有误,推测是photocopied)。测量牙本质剖面的宽度和深度,精确到0.1毫米,从而确定深度与宽度的比值,并记录每个挖舀表面最深部分的位置。澳大利亚原住民天然牙中挖舀牙本质的平均深度与宽度之比(0.19±0.06,平均值±标准误)显著高于澳大利亚原住民牙模(0.15±0.04)。有磨损的澳大利亚原住民天然牙和牙模的比值均显著小于显示侵蚀的高加索人牙模(0.33±0.07,p<0.05)。此外,在磨损样本中,上颌牙挖舀牙本质的最深区域往往更多地位于舌侧,而下颌牙则更多地位于颊侧(p<0.05)。这些结果表明,牙齿磨损咬合面上的挖舀牙本质与主要由侵蚀导致的挖舀牙本质在形状上存在显著差异。