• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

磨损和侵蚀导致的暴露牙本质表面的比较。

Comparison of exposed dentinal surfaces resulting from abrasion and erosion.

作者信息

Bell E J, Kaidonis J, Townsend G, Richards L

机构信息

Department of Dentistry, University of Adelaide, Australia.

出版信息

Aust Dent J. 1998 Oct;43(5):362-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1998.tb00190.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1834-7819.1998.tb00190.x
PMID:9848991
Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the shape of exposed dentinal surfaces caused by abrasion and erosion with a view to developing a diagnostic clinical test. The study material consisted of 80 natural teeth and 129 dental models obtained from Australian Aborigines known to display considerable dental abrasion due to their diet, and dental models of 37 Caucasians diagnosed with dental erosion through detailed history and dietary analysis. Polyvinyl siloxane impressions were obtained of all occlusal surfaces with dentinal scooping in both the 'abrasion' and 'erosion' groups. All impressions were sectioned buccolingually through the deepest point of the scooped dentine, and then the profiles were photocopied at x2 magnification. The breadth and depth of dentinal profiles were measured to an accuracy of 0.1 mm, enabling ratios of depth:breadth to be determined, and the position of the deepest part of each scooped surface was recorded. The mean depth:breadth ratio of scooped dentine was significantly greater in the Aboriginal natural teeth (0.19 +/- 0.06, mean +/- SE) than in the Aboriginal dental models (0.15 +/- 0.04). Both Aboriginal natural teeth and models with abrasion showed significantly smaller ratios (p < 0.05) than the Caucasian models showing erosion (0.33 +/- 0.07). Furthermore, in the abrasion samples, the deepest region of the scooped dentine tended to be lingually placed more often in maxillary teeth but buccally placed more often in mandibular teeth (p < 0.05). These results indicate that scooped dentine on abraded occlusal surfaces of teeth displays significant differences in shape compared with that caused mainly by erosion.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较磨损和侵蚀导致的牙本质暴露表面的形状,以期开发一种诊断性临床测试。研究材料包括80颗天然牙和129个牙模,这些天然牙和牙模取自已知因饮食而有明显牙齿磨损的澳大利亚原住民,以及通过详细病史和饮食分析被诊断为牙齿侵蚀的37名高加索人的牙模。对“磨损”组和“侵蚀”组所有有牙本质挖舀的咬合面制取聚醚橡胶印模。所有印模均在挖舀牙本质的最深点进行颊舌向剖切,然后将剖面以2倍放大率进行 photocopied(此处原文可能有误,推测是photocopied)。测量牙本质剖面的宽度和深度,精确到0.1毫米,从而确定深度与宽度的比值,并记录每个挖舀表面最深部分的位置。澳大利亚原住民天然牙中挖舀牙本质的平均深度与宽度之比(0.19±0.06,平均值±标准误)显著高于澳大利亚原住民牙模(0.15±0.04)。有磨损的澳大利亚原住民天然牙和牙模的比值均显著小于显示侵蚀的高加索人牙模(0.33±0.07,p<0.05)。此外,在磨损样本中,上颌牙挖舀牙本质的最深区域往往更多地位于舌侧,而下颌牙则更多地位于颊侧(p<0.05)。这些结果表明,牙齿磨损咬合面上的挖舀牙本质与主要由侵蚀导致的挖舀牙本质在形状上存在显著差异。

相似文献

1
Comparison of exposed dentinal surfaces resulting from abrasion and erosion.磨损和侵蚀导致的暴露牙本质表面的比较。
Aust Dent J. 1998 Oct;43(5):362-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1998.tb00190.x.
2
A qualitative assessment of non-carious cervical lesions in extracted human teeth.对拔除的人类牙齿中非龋性颈部病变的定性评估。
Aust Dent J. 2008 Mar;53(1):46-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2007.00009.x.
3
Tooth wear rates among contemporary Australian Aborigines.当代澳大利亚原住民的牙齿磨损率。
J Dent Res. 1983 May;62(5):562-5. doi: 10.1177/00220345830620051101.
4
The early wear susceptibility of cementum, enamel and dentine in vitro.体外牙骨质、牙釉质和牙本质的早期磨损易感性。
J Dent. 2022 Dec;127:104339. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104339. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
5
Dental Surface Texture Characterization Based on Erosive Tooth Wear Processes.基于侵蚀性牙齿磨损过程的牙齿表面纹理特征分析
J Dent Res. 2016 May;95(5):537-42. doi: 10.1177/0022034516629941. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
6
Use of polyvinyl siloxane impressions to monitor sub-5-μm erosive tooth wear on unpolished enamel.使用聚乙烯基硅氧烷印模监测未抛光牙釉质上小于5微米的侵蚀性牙齿磨损。
J Prosthet Dent. 2025 Feb;133(2):577-583. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.04.020. Epub 2023 May 25.
7
Is bovine dentine an appropriate substitute for human dentine in erosion/abrasion tests?在侵蚀/磨损试验中,牛牙本质是否是人类牙本质的合适替代品?
J Oral Rehabil. 2008 May;35(5):390-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01843.x.
8
Scanning electron microscopy of attrited dentinal surfaces and subajacent dentin in human teeth.人类牙齿磨耗牙本质表面及邻近牙本质的扫描电子显微镜观察。
Scand J Dent Res. 1973;81(2):112-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1973.tb01501.x.
9
Comparison of methods for quantifying dental wear caused by erosion and abrasion.比较量化由酸蚀和磨损导致的牙齿磨损的方法。
Microsc Res Tech. 2013 Feb;76(2):178-83. doi: 10.1002/jemt.22150. Epub 2012 Nov 6.
10
Principal axis analysis of dental attrition data from two Australian Aboriginal populations.来自两个澳大利亚原住民群体的牙齿磨损数据的主轴分析。
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1984 Sep;65(1):5-13. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330650103.

引用本文的文献

1
An anthropological perspective: another dimension to modern dental wear concepts.一种人类学视角:现代牙齿磨损概念的另一个维度。
Int J Dent. 2012;2012:741405. doi: 10.1155/2012/741405. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
2
Effect of acidic agents on surface roughness of dental ceramics.酸性剂对牙科陶瓷表面粗糙度的影响。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2011 Winter;8(1):6-15.
3
Effect of naturally acidic agents on microhardness and surface micromorphology of restorative materials.天然酸性剂对修复材料显微硬度和表面微观形态的影响。
Eur J Dent. 2011 Jan;5(1):89-100.
4
How valid are current diagnostic criteria for dental erosion?当前牙齿侵蚀的诊断标准有多有效?
Clin Oral Investig. 2008 Mar;12 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S41-9. doi: 10.1007/s00784-007-0175-3. Epub 2008 Jan 29.
5
Tooth wear: the view of the anthropologist.牙齿磨损:人类学家的观点。
Clin Oral Investig. 2008 Mar;12 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S21-6. doi: 10.1007/s00784-007-0154-8. Epub 2007 Oct 16.