Suppr超能文献

淋巴增殖性疾病中的干细胞动员

Stem cell mobilisation in lymphoproliferative diseases.

作者信息

Russell N H, McQuaker G, Stainer C, Byrne J L, Haynes A P

机构信息

Division of Haematology, School of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, University of Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

Bone Marrow Transplant. 1998 Nov;22(10):935-40. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1701477.

Abstract

A number of different regimens have evolved for the mobilisation of peripheral blood stem cells for autologous transplantation in patients with lymphoma or myeloma. A successful regimen could be defined as one which consistently resulted in the collection of an optimal number of CD34+ cells with a minimum number of apheresis procedures with minimal toxicity. Initial protocols, which used chemotherapy alone as a mobilising agent, have now been replaced by regimens involving the use of haematopoietic growth factors either alone or in combination with variable doses of cyclophosphamide. Although there is good evidence that high-dose cyclophosphamide (6-7 g/m2) is an effective mobilising agent it is associated with significant toxicity and many groups have now utilised lower doses of cyclophosphamide with reduced toxicity which have still proven to be effective in the majority of patients. More recently a number of 'second generation' combined salvage chemotherapy and mobilisation regimens have been reported for use in the lymphomas which have the advantage of avoiding a specific stem cell mobilisation step and at the same time appear more consistently effective at mobilising stem cells than cyclophosphamide and G-CSF. These regimens are associated with fewer 'poor-mobilisers' and indeed some patients who have failed previous mobilisation with cyclophosphamide and G-CSF have been successfully re-mobilised. It is clear that in both lymphoma and myeloma patients the success of PBSC mobilisation is affected by the amount and type of previous chemotherapy and radiotherapy and probably other pre-treatment factors as exemplified by variability seen in normal donors mobilised with G-CSF alone. In myeloma most groups have utilised cyclophosphamide in variable doses in combination with G-CSF or GM-CSF. However, recent randomised studies have confirmed that G-CSF alone is an effective and nontoxic alternative although it appears that the efficacy of G-CSF as a single agent is related to the dosage used with daily doses of 16 microg/kg/day or greater being most effective. Thus, disease-specific mobilisation strategies appear to be emerging and these will undoubtedly be modified further as more is understood concerning the biology of blood stem cell mobilisation.

摘要

针对淋巴瘤或骨髓瘤患者进行自体移植时动员外周血干细胞,已经发展出了多种不同的方案。一个成功的方案可以定义为:能够始终如一地采集到最佳数量的CD34+细胞,且采集次数最少、毒性最小。最初仅使用化疗作为动员剂的方案,现在已被单独使用造血生长因子或与不同剂量环磷酰胺联合使用的方案所取代。尽管有充分证据表明高剂量环磷酰胺(6-7 g/m2)是一种有效的动员剂,但它具有显著毒性,现在许多研究组已使用较低剂量的环磷酰胺,毒性降低,且在大多数患者中仍被证明有效。最近,有报道称一些“第二代”联合挽救化疗和动员方案可用于淋巴瘤,其优点是避免了特定的干细胞动员步骤,同时在动员干细胞方面似乎比环磷酰胺和粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)更具一致性效果。这些方案与“动员不佳者”较少相关,实际上,一些先前使用环磷酰胺和G-CSF动员失败的患者已成功再次动员。显然,在淋巴瘤和骨髓瘤患者中,外周血干细胞动员的成功受先前化疗和放疗的剂量及类型以及可能的其他预处理因素影响,就像单独使用G-CSF动员的正常供者中所见的变异性所例证的那样。在骨髓瘤中,大多数研究组使用不同剂量的环磷酰胺与G-CSF或粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(GM-CSF)联合使用。然而,最近的随机研究证实,单独使用G-CSF是一种有效且无毒的替代方法,尽管似乎G-CSF作为单一药物的疗效与所用剂量有关,每日剂量为16μg/kg/天或更高时最有效。因此,针对特定疾病的动员策略似乎正在出现,随着对血液干细胞动员生物学的了解增多,这些策略无疑将进一步得到改进。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验