Shinefield H R, Black S B, Staehle B O, Adelman T, Ensor K, Ngai A, White C J, Bird S R, Matthews H, Kuter B J
Kaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center, Oakland, CA 94115, USA.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1998 Nov;17(11):980-5. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199811000-00003.
The primary objectives of this study were to compare immunologic responses, antibody persistence, safety and varicella breakthrough rates when VARIVAX (varicella vaccine) is given at the same time as M-M-R II (measles, mumps, rubella vaccine) and TETRAMUNE (conjugate Haemophilus influenzae type b, diphtheria, tetanus and whole cell pertussis vaccine) at separate injection sites (Group A) vs. VARIVAX given 6 weeks after M-M-R II and TETRAMUNE (Group B). Six hundred nine healthy children, 12 to 23 months of age, were randomized to one of two treatment (immunization) groups (Group A and Group B). Blood for antibody titers was drawn on the day of immunization, 6 weeks after each injection and 1 year later. Local and systemic adverse reactions were recorded. Exposure and cases of varicella were documented through a 1-year follow-up period.
Measles, mumps and rubella seroconversion rates and geometric mean titers (GMTs) were similar for both treatment groups. Varicella seroconversion rates were also similar between groups. However, varicella GMTs and percent with a varicella-protective level [> or =5.0 glycoprotein (gp) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) units] did not meet the prespecified criteria for similarity were lower for Group A (GMT 10.5; 82.8% > or =5.0 gp ELISA units) than for Group B (GMT 14.5; 91.2% > or =5.0 gp ELISA units). The GMTs between groups for other antibodies were similar. At the 1-year follow-up antibody titers were comparable in both groups and breakthrough varicella cases appeared generally similar. There were fewer local adverse events (AEs) at the VARIVAX injection sites (9.8% and 2.9%, Group A and B, respectively) than at the TETRAMUNE sites (27.9% and 24.0%). Systemic AEs were not statistically different when M-M-R II was administered alone (8.6%) or concomitantly with VARIVAX (8.9%). When VARIVAX was given alone AEs were 1.8%. The rate of fever > or =102 degrees F after M-M-R II and TETRAMUNE administered together was 10.7% on Days 0 to 3 and 23.7% on Days 7 to 21. When VARIVAX was administered alone, the rate of fever was 5.4% on Days 0 to 3 (P = 0.018) and 10.8% on Days 7 to 21 (P<0.001).
Because the varicella titers were comparable and varicella breakthrough rates generally similar at 1 year in both groups, we expect that the concomitant administration of VARIVAX with M-M-R II and TETRAMUNE has clinical effectiveness similar to that with VARIVAX 6 weeks after the administration of these other two vaccines. VARIVAX appears to be less reactogenic than M-M-R II and TETRAMUNE.
本研究的主要目的是比较在不同注射部位同时接种水痘疫苗(VARIVAX)与麻腮风疫苗(M-M-R II)及四联疫苗(TETRAMUNE,b型流感嗜血杆菌结合疫苗、白喉、破伤风及全细胞百日咳疫苗)(A组)与在接种M-M-R II和TETRAMUNE 6周后接种VARIVAX(B组)时的免疫反应、抗体持久性、安全性和水痘突破率。609名12至23个月大的健康儿童被随机分为两个治疗(免疫)组之一(A组和B组)。在免疫接种当天、每次注射后6周及1年后采集血液检测抗体滴度。记录局部和全身不良反应。通过1年的随访记录水痘暴露情况和病例。
两个治疗组的麻疹、腮腺炎和风疹血清转化率及几何平均滴度(GMT)相似。两组间水痘血清转化率也相似。然而,水痘GMT及具有水痘保护水平[≥5.0糖蛋白(gp)酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)单位]的百分比未达到预先设定的相似性标准,A组(GMT 10.5;82.8%≥5.0 gp ELISA单位)低于B组(GMT 14.5;91.2%≥5.0 gp ELISA单位)。两组间其他抗体的GMT相似。在1年随访时,两组抗体滴度相当,水痘突破病例总体相似。VARIVAX注射部位的局部不良事件(AE)比TETRAMUNE注射部位少(A组和B组分别为9.8%和2.9%,而TETRAMUNE注射部位分别为27.9%和24.0%)。单独接种M-M-R II时的全身AE(8.6%)与同时接种VARIVAX时(8.9%)无统计学差异。单独接种VARIVAX时AE为1.8%。M-M-R II和TETRAMUNE一起接种后第0至3天发热≥1华氏度(102华氏度约为38.9摄氏度)的发生率为10.7%,第7至21天为23.7%。单独接种VARIVAX时,第0至3天发热率为5.4%(P = 0.018),第7至21天为10.8%(P<0.001)。
由于两组在1年时水痘滴度相当且水痘突破率总体相似,我们预计VARIVAX与M-M-R II和TETRAMUNE同时接种的临床效果与在接种这两种疫苗6周后接种VARIVAX相似。VARIVAX似乎比M-M-R II和TETRAMUNE的反应原性更低。