Suppr超能文献

回答种族问题的人有关系吗?巴西的种族分类与收入不平等

Does it matter who answers the race question? Racial classification and income inequality in Brazil.

作者信息

Telles E E, Lim N

机构信息

Ford Foundation, Rio de Janeiro Office, New York, NY 10017, USA.

出版信息

Demography. 1998 Nov;35(4):465-74.

PMID:9850470
Abstract

Previous studies of racial inequality have relied on official statistics that presumably use self-classification of race. Using novel data from a 1995 national survey in Brazil, we find that the estimates of racial income inequality based on self-classification are lower than those based on interviewer classification. After human capital and labor market controls, whites earn 26% more than browns with interviewer classification but earn only 17% more than browns with self-classification. Black-brown differences hardly change: Blacks earn 13% and 12% less than browns with interviewer classification and self-classification, respectively. We contend that interviewer classification of race is more appropriate because analysts of racial inequality are interested in the effects of racial discrimination, which depends on how others classify one's race.

摘要

以往关于种族不平等的研究依赖于官方统计数据,这些数据大概使用的是种族的自我分类。利用巴西1995年全国调查的新数据,我们发现基于自我分类的种族收入不平等估计低于基于访谈者分类的估计。在控制了人力资本和劳动力市场因素后,按照访谈者分类,白人比棕色人种的收入高26%,但按照自我分类,白人只比棕色人种多挣17%。黑人和棕色人种之间的差异变化不大:按照访谈者分类,黑人比棕色人种少挣13%,按照自我分类则少挣12%。我们认为访谈者对种族的分类更合适,因为种族不平等的分析者感兴趣的是种族歧视的影响,而这取决于他人如何对一个人的种族进行分类。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验