Preda L, La Fianza A, Di Maggio E M, Dore R, Schifino M R, Mevio E, Campani R
Istituto di Radiologia, Università, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia.
Radiol Med. 1998 Sep;96(3):178-84.
Adequate radiologic assessment of the maxillofacial trauma patient is the basis for planning reparative surgery. We investigated the yield of the integration of axial CT with multiplanar (MP) and three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions with the Spiral technique.
Thirty-five patients (21 men and 14 women, mean age: 31.2 years) with complex maxillofacial traumas were submitted to Spiral CT. Images were acquired with 2-3-mm collimation, 1:1 to 2:1 pitch, 210 mAs, 120 kV, 15-24 s Spiral scan, RI = 1. 3D reconstructions were always obtained and used to guide MPRs targeted on the single injury. The examinations were retrospectively given a score, namely 1 if 3D and MPR yielded no more important diagnostic information than axial CT, 2 if 3D and MPR permitted better detailing of some axial CT findings and thus improved image reading, and 3 if 3D and MPR showed new injuries missed on axial images. Then, a radiologist and a maxillofacial surgeon reviewed the 3D images together only to assess in which cases they were useful to optimize surgical planning.
Nine cases (25.7%) scored 1, seventeen (48.6%) scored 2 and nine (25.7%) scored 3. MP and 3D reconstructions were useful or determinant (2 + 3) in over 74% of cases. 3D images made surgical planning easier in 15 of 32 surgical patients (46.8%), allowing the surgeon a better panoramic view of the complex fracture.
The greatest advantage of multiplanar imaging is the improved depiction of skeletal injuries along a horizontal plane, paralleling that of axial scans. The depiction of fractures of cribrum and of orbital roof and floor was particularly useful from a clinical viewpoint. MPRs clearly depicted herniation and incarceration of the lower rectus muscle in blow-out fractures. MP and 3D reconstructions better defined the presence and grade of displaced bone fragments in nearly vertical structures, such as the upward branches and coronoid apophysis of the mandible. 3D images alone never showed any more fractures than those seen on axial and MP images. 3D images are especially useful to the surgeon because they permit the panoramic depiction of the fracture complex, which facilitates treatment planning. The radiologist can use 3D reconstructions to guide the acquisition of targeted MP reconstructions, for better diagnostic yield. The Spiral technique, with its pitch increases up to 2, permits to limit the radiation dose while preserving the quality of postprocessing reconstructions. Finally, decreasing the execution time is important in multiple trauma patients who are often clinically unstable or have damaged vital organs.
对面部创伤患者进行充分的放射学评估是修复手术规划的基础。我们研究了螺旋技术下轴向CT与多平面(MP)及三维(3D)重建相结合的诊断价值。
35例(21例男性,14例女性,平均年龄:31.2岁)复杂面部创伤患者接受螺旋CT检查。扫描参数为:准直2 - 3mm,螺距1:1至2:1,管电流210mAs,管电压120kV,螺旋扫描时间15 - 24s,重建间隔1。所有患者均进行3D重建,并用于指导针对单一损伤的多平面重建(MPR)。回顾性地对检查结果进行评分:若3D和MPR未提供比轴向CT更重要的诊断信息,则评分为1分;若3D和MPR能更好地显示轴向CT的某些发现,从而改善图像解读,则评分为2分;若3D和MPR显示出轴向图像上遗漏的新损伤,则评分为3分。然后,一名放射科医生和一名颌面外科医生共同查看3D图像,以评估其在哪些情况下有助于优化手术规划。
9例(25.7%)评分为1分,17例(48.6%)评分为2分,9例(25.7%)评分为3分。MP和3D重建在超过74%的病例中有用或起决定性作用(2分 + 3分)。在32例接受手术的患者中,3D图像使手术规划更容易的有15例(46.8%),使外科医生能更好地全景观察复杂骨折情况。
多平面成像的最大优势在于能更好地显示沿水平面的骨骼损伤,与轴向扫描相当。从临床角度看,筛骨及眶顶和眶底骨折的显示尤为有用。MPR能清晰显示爆裂骨折中下直肌的疝出和嵌顿。MP和3D重建能更好地确定几乎垂直结构(如下颌骨向上分支和冠突)中移位骨碎片的存在及程度。单独的3D图像从未显示出比轴向和MP图像更多的骨折。3D图像对外科医生特别有用,因为它们能全景显示骨折复合体,便于治疗规划。放射科医生可利用3D重建指导获取针对性的MP重建,以提高诊断效率。螺旋技术的螺距增加至2,在保持后处理重建质量的同时可限制辐射剂量。最后,缩短检查执行时间对多创伤患者很重要,这类患者通常临床情况不稳定或重要器官受损。