Suppr超能文献

当代高加索裔和非裔美国女性面部轮廓的软组织评估。

Soft tissue evaluation of contemporary Caucasian and African American female facial profiles.

作者信息

Sutter R E, Turley P K

机构信息

University of California at Los Angeles, USA.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 1998 Dec;68(6):487-96. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1998)068<0487:STEOCC>2.3.CO;2.

Abstract

Previous studies suggest that esthetic Caucasian profiles exhibit fuller lips than the norm for their race, while esthetic African American profiles are similar to those of esthetic Caucasians. The present study was undertaken to compare the profiles of female Caucasian and African American models and their nonmodel counterparts. Four groups of 30 subjects were evaluated: Caucasian models [CM], Caucasian controls [CC], African American models [AM], and African American controls [AC]. The models' profiles were photographed from current fashion magazines, the photos were scanned, and 17 landmarks were digitized. Each profile was standardized for size and oriented along the N'-Sn' line on a Macintosh 6115CD computer. Control photographs were processed in a similar manner. Twenty-six variables were measured for each profile. Means, ranges, and standard deviations were computed along with unpaired, two-tailed Student's t-tests (p<0.05) to evaluate group differences. The results showed that for the AM and AC profiles, all but two of the 26 variable were similar. For the CM and CC profiles, eight variables demonstrated significant differences. Between-race comparisons demonstrated greater numbers of parameters that were significantly different: CM/AM with 18 and CM/AC, CC/AC, and CC/AM with 22 each. Most of the differences involved the lips. Vertical soft tissue proportions for the four groups did not follow a 40/20/40 ratio. Caucasian and African American models displayed significantly different profile characteristics. The African American models and controls showed similar profile features, whereas greater differences were observed between Caucasian models and controls. Based on our study, the African American profile currently presented in the mass media is not "Caucasian-like." In fact, it appears that Caucasian models display more ethnic features than African American models do Caucasian features, suggesting that previously held concepts of facial beauty may no longer apply.

摘要

以往研究表明,具有美感的白种人面部轮廓显示其嘴唇比同种族的一般人更丰满,而具有美感的非裔美国人面部轮廓则与具有美感的白种人相似。本研究旨在比较白种人和非裔美国女性模特及其非模特对照者的面部轮廓。对四组各30名受试者进行了评估:白种人模特[CM]、白种人对照者[CC]、非裔美国模特[AM]和非裔美国对照者[AC]。从当前时尚杂志上拍摄模特的面部轮廓照片,扫描照片,并将17个标志点数字化。在Macintosh 6115CD计算机上,对每个面部轮廓的大小进行标准化,并沿鼻根点-前鼻棘线定向。对照照片以类似方式处理。对每个面部轮廓测量26个变量。计算均值、范围和标准差,并进行不成对双尾学生t检验(p<0.05)以评估组间差异。结果显示,对于AM和AC面部轮廓,26个变量中除两个外其余均相似。对于CM和CC面部轮廓,8个变量显示出显著差异。种族间比较显示有更多参数存在显著差异:CM/AM有18个,CM/AC、CC/AC和CC/AM各有22个。大多数差异涉及嘴唇。四组的垂直软组织比例未遵循40/20/40的比例。白种人和非裔美国模特表现出显著不同的面部轮廓特征。非裔美国模特和对照者表现出相似的面部轮廓特征,而白种人模特和对照者之间的差异更大。基于我们的研究,大众媒体目前呈现的非裔美国人面部轮廓并非“类似白种人”。事实上,似乎白种人模特比非裔美国模特展现出更多的种族特征,而非裔美国模特展现出更多的白种人特征,这表明以前关于面部美的观念可能不再适用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验