Suppr超能文献

一项关于非梗阻性无精子症男性睾丸精子提取中多次针吸活检与单次开放活检的前瞻性研究。

A prospective study of multiple needle biopsies versus a single open biopsy for testicular sperm extraction in men with non-obstructive azoospermia.

作者信息

Ezeh U I, Moore H D, Cooke I D

机构信息

University Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jessop Hospital For Women, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

Hum Reprod. 1998 Nov;13(11):3075-80. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.11.3075.

Abstract

Little is known about the efficacy and the factors affecting the outcome of fine needle aspiration biopsy of the testis for sperm retrieval in azoospermic men with defective spermatogenesis. A prospective study was designed to compare the efficacy of needle and open (window) testicular biopsies for testicular epididymal sperm extraction (TESE) in 35 consecutive men with azoospermia due to defective spermatogenesis undergoing testicular biopsy for intracytoplasmic injection of oocytes. Each of the consecutive 35 patients underwent TESE using a 19 gauge butterfly needle followed by a window (1-1.5 cm-sized incision) testicular biopsy in the same procedure. The extraction of spermatozoa into culture medium was compared with the assessment of testicular biopsies by histology, the mode of biopsy (needle or open biopsy) and the amount of tissue retrieved by either method. Testicular spermatozoa were retrieved in 22 (63%) who had an open testicular biopsy compared with five (14%) patients who had multiple needle biopsies, respectively; the difference was statistically significant. Open testicular biopsy retrieves more testicular tissue than needle biopsy. Needle testicular biopsy retrieved testicular spermatozoa in 50% of those with hypospermatogenesis, 10% with focal spermatogenesis and in no patients with maturation arrest or Sertoli cell-only pattern. In contrast, sperm retrieval was successful in 100%, 90% and 66% of those with respective histologies using open testicular biopsy. Other than bruising, for which they required no analgesia, none of the patients suffered any obvious complications associated with traditional testicular biopsy. We conclude that open testicular biopsy is more effective than needle biopsy for the retrieval of testicular spermatozoa in azoospermic men with defective spermatogenesis. The difference observed may be related to the amount of testicular tissue retrieved and to the influence of testicular histology.

摘要

对于生精功能缺陷的无精子症男性,通过睾丸细针穿刺活检获取精子的疗效以及影响其结果的因素知之甚少。一项前瞻性研究旨在比较35例因生精功能缺陷而进行睾丸活检以用于卵母细胞胞浆内注射的连续无精子症男性,采用针吸式和开放式(开窗)睾丸活检进行睾丸附睾精子提取(TESE)的疗效。这35例连续患者中的每一位均先使用19号蝶形针进行TESE,然后在同一手术中进行开窗(1 - 1.5厘米大小切口)睾丸活检。将精子提取到培养基中的情况与通过组织学评估睾丸活检、活检方式(针吸或开放式活检)以及两种方法获取的组织量进行比较。分别有22例(63%)进行开放式睾丸活检的患者获取到了睾丸精子,而进行多次针吸活检的患者中有5例(14%)获取到了睾丸精子;差异具有统计学意义。开放式睾丸活检获取的睾丸组织比针吸活检更多。针吸式睾丸活检在50%的生精功能低下患者、10%的局灶性生精患者中获取到了睾丸精子,而在成熟停滞或唯支持细胞模式的患者中未获取到。相比之下,采用开放式睾丸活检时,在具有相应组织学特征的患者中,精子获取成功率分别为100%、90%和66%。除了出现无需镇痛的瘀伤外,没有患者出现与传统睾丸活检相关的任何明显并发症。我们得出结论,对于生精功能缺陷的无精子症男性,开放式睾丸活检在获取睾丸精子方面比针吸活检更有效。观察到的差异可能与获取的睾丸组织量以及睾丸组织学的影响有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验