Freeman D, Garety P, Fowler D, Kuipers E, Dunn G, Bebbington P, Hadley C
Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Denmark Hill, London, UK.
Br J Clin Psychol. 1998 Nov;37(4):415-30. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1998.tb01399.x.
There has been a resurgence of interest in the view that persecutory delusions serve a function of defending self-esteem. An alternative account of levels of self-esteem in individuals with persecutory delusions is that they result from processes similar to those studied in people with depression (i.e. from the occurrence of a range of life experiences and how the individual interprets and copes with them). This study aimed to examine both hypotheses together for the first time, and, as the literature indicates that delusions may not share a common cause, attention was given to the possibility of the presence of subgroups.
Data were examined cross-sectionally and longitudinally from a randomized controlled trial of cognitive behaviour therapy for 60 people with drug-resistant psychosis.
The study is based on the initial assessment of all participants on self-esteem, delusional conviction and a large number of demographic, clinical and cognitive measures. Longitudinal analyses were also carried out, and are reported separately for those who received the therapy intervention and those in the control group.
Almost three-quarters of participants with persecutory delusions reported low self-esteem. Changes over time in total self-esteem correlated with changes in measures of mood and social functioning, but not conviction in persecutory delusions. The individuals who initially had normal levels of self-esteem displayed a different pattern of results from the majority of participants.
Low self-esteem in people with drug-resistant persecutory delusions is common and, in most cases, can best be understood in terms of normal emotional processes. There was evidence that the majority of persecutory delusions do not fit either strong or weak formulations of the delusion-as-defence explanation and that there may be subgroups with differing aetiologies. These results need to be replicated, and extended to groups in which symptoms are not resistant to medication.
认为迫害妄想具有维护自尊功能的观点再度引发了人们的兴趣。对于有迫害妄想的个体的自尊水平,另一种解释是,它们源于与抑郁症患者所研究的过程类似的过程(即源于一系列生活经历的发生以及个体如何解释和应对这些经历)。本研究旨在首次同时检验这两种假设,并且,鉴于文献表明妄想可能并非有共同原因,所以关注了存在亚组的可能性。
对60名耐药性精神病患者进行的认知行为疗法随机对照试验的数据进行了横断面和纵向研究。
该研究基于对所有参与者进行的关于自尊、妄想信念以及大量人口统计学、临床和认知指标的初始评估。还进行了纵向分析,并分别报告了接受治疗干预的参与者和对照组参与者的情况。
近四分之三有迫害妄想的参与者报告自尊水平较低。总体自尊随时间的变化与情绪和社会功能指标的变化相关,但与迫害妄想的信念无关。最初自尊水平正常的个体呈现出与大多数参与者不同的结果模式。
耐药性迫害妄想患者中自尊水平较低很常见,并且在大多数情况下,最好从正常的情绪过程角度来理解。有证据表明,大多数迫害妄想并不符合妄想即防御这一解释的强版本或弱版本,并且可能存在病因不同的亚组。这些结果需要重复验证,并扩展到症状对药物治疗有反应的群体。