Beier D, Blankenstein P, Fechner H
Bundesforschungsanstalt für Viruskrankheiten der Tiere, Institut für epidemiologische Diagnostik, Wusterhausen.
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 1998 Nov;105(11):408-12.
Enzootic bovine leukosis is caused by the bovine leukemia virus (BLV) and has a world wide distribution in cattle. Due to the program for eradication of BLV-infections in Germany the BLV incidence in cattle declined and only few new cases seem to occur per year. On the other hand, BLV-infected cattle with low, transient or without BLV-antibody titers are difficult to identify as BLV-infected. These animals may be sources for new infections. It was the aim of this study to compare the suitability of agargel-immunodiffusion (AGID), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for diagnosis of BLV-infected cattle. We investigated a herd with 10 cows, where after a long period when the herd was negative suddenly a positive serological reaction appeared. In addition 64 animals from 6 federal states of different herds with doubtful serological reactions found in previous tests were included. In the herd with 10 cows we were able to detect BLV-infection in one animal 8 weeks earlier with PCR than with ELISA. Investigation of 56 adult cattle and 3 calves from different herds with both PCR and ELISA showed that 51 animals were positive in ELISA and 55 in PCR. Seven animal were positive in PCR and negative in ELISA. Three calves yielded negative results in PCR and positive results in ELISA. One cow which was positive in previous serological tests was negative in ELISA, AGID and PCR. Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis demonstrated that the majority of the cattle was infected with the same BLV provirus variant. The four PCR variants used in this study yielded a similar sensitivity for BLV provirus detection. In conclusion, compared to the serological tests, PCR detects BLV-infection earlier in naturally infected cattle. The method is also a useful tool to exclude or confirm BLV-infection in cattle with doubtful serological results. PCR may be used to complement the serological tests in the diagnosis of BLV-infection.
地方性牛白血病由牛白血病病毒(BLV)引起,在全球牛群中广泛分布。由于德国开展了根除BLV感染的计划,牛群中BLV的发病率有所下降,每年似乎只有少数新病例出现。另一方面,BLV抗体滴度低、短暂或无抗体滴度的感染牛很难被识别为BLV感染牛。这些动物可能是新感染的来源。本研究的目的是比较琼脂凝胶免疫扩散(AGID)、酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)和聚合酶链反应(PCR)诊断BLV感染牛的适用性。我们调查了一个有10头奶牛的牛群,在该牛群长期呈阴性后,突然出现了阳性血清学反应。此外,还纳入了来自6个联邦州不同牛群的64只动物,这些动物在之前的检测中血清学反应可疑。在有10头奶牛的牛群中,我们通过PCR比ELISA早8周检测到一头动物感染了BLV。对来自不同牛群的56头成年牛和3头犊牛同时进行PCR和ELISA检测,结果显示51只动物ELISA呈阳性,55只PCR呈阳性。7只动物PCR呈阳性,ELISA呈阴性。3头犊牛PCR结果为阴性,ELISA结果为阳性。一头之前血清学检测呈阳性的奶牛,ELISA、AGID和PCR检测均为阴性。限制性片段长度多态性分析表明,大多数牛感染的是同一BLV前病毒变体。本研究中使用的四种PCR变体对BLV前病毒检测的敏感性相似。总之,与血清学检测相比,PCR能更早地检测出自然感染牛中的BLV感染。该方法也是排除或确认血清学结果可疑的牛是否感染BLV的有用工具。PCR可用于补充血清学检测以诊断BLV感染。