Dahlgren M A
Faculty of Health Sciences, Linkopings Universitet, Sweden.
Physiother Res Int. 1998;3(4):257-73. doi: 10.1002/pri.149.
The aim of this paper was to describe and analyse the impact of formal education and professional experience on physiotherapy students' ways of experiencing interaction within a patient encounter.
Two groups of physiotherapy students were interviewed on two occasions; during the second and last term of their formal education programme, and during the last term and after 18 months' professional experience. Data were subjected to a qualitative analysis. Changes in conceptions between the two interview occasions were described quantitatively.
Subjects' ways of experiencing interaction within a patient encounter could be described in four main categories: Mutuality; Technicalism; Authority and Juxtaposition. Mutuality and Technicalism denoted an integration of the communicative and problem-solving processes involved in the encounter, the former category from a patient-centred and the latter from a physiotherapist-centred perspective. Authority and Juxtaposition denoted a separation of the processes, the former from a physiotherapist-centred perspective and the latter from a patient-centred one.
The results show a trend as regards direction of change in conceptions from separated to integrated perspectives on the communicative and problem-solving processes after the formal education programme. After 18 months' professional practice the Mutuality category dominated.
本文旨在描述和分析正规教育与专业经验对物理治疗专业学生在患者诊疗过程中体验互动方式的影响。
两组物理治疗专业学生接受了两次访谈,分别在正规教育课程的第二学期末和最后一学期,以及最后一学期和拥有18个月专业经验之后。对数据进行定性分析,并定量描述两次访谈之间观念的变化。
学生在患者诊疗过程中体验互动的方式可分为四大类:相互性、技术主义、权威性和并列性。相互性和技术主义表示诊疗过程中沟通与解决问题过程的整合,前者以患者为中心,后者以物理治疗师为中心。权威性和并列性表示这些过程的分离,前者以物理治疗师为中心,后者以患者为中心。
结果显示,在正规教育课程之后,学生对沟通与解决问题过程的观念从分离视角向整合视角转变呈现出一种趋势。在18个月的专业实践之后,相互性类别占主导。