• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性髓性白血病非随机分组患者的长期结果:单机构经验

Long-term results in non randomized patients with acute myelogenous leukemia: a single institution experience.

作者信息

Deliliers G L, Annaloro C, Oriani A, Della Volpe A, Boschetti C, Cortelezzi A, Maiolo A T

机构信息

Cattedra di Medicina Interna, Ospedale Maggiore IRCCS e Università degli Studi di Milano.

出版信息

Ann Ital Med Int. 1998 Jul-Sep;13(3):146-51.

PMID:9859570
Abstract

Sixty-three non randomized adults with acute myelogenous leukemia were treated with an idarubicin-based protocol. The patients achieving complete remission received autologous bone marrow transplantation or (if > 50 years or refusing autologous bone marrow transplantation) high-dose Ara-C, as late intensification. Fifty-two patients (82.5%) achieved complete remission, 45 after one induction course and 16 of them underwent autologous bone marrow transplantation a median of 11 months later. As of December 1997 (median follow-up 112 months, range 50-135 months), 16 patients were still in complete remission (10 after autologous bone marrow transplantation, 6 after high-dose Ara-C) and 29 had relapsed (median time to relapse 14 months, range 2-75 months). Four patients died in complete remission. The median disease-free survival was 25 months; the 50-months and 10-year disease-free survival were 41% and 35% respectively. No significant differences were observed between the autologous bone marrow transplantation and high-dose Ara-C treated patients whose complete remission had lasted more than 11 months. The median disease-free survival in the autografted patients had not been reached after 120 months (the 50-month and 10-year disease-free survival chances were both 67%). Age was the only predictive variable for leukemic relapse. These long-term results confirm the antileukemic efficacy of an idarubicin-containing protocol, which led to high complete remission rates and favorably influenced disease-free survival. Furthermore, the efficacy of late intensification treatment with either autologous bone marrow transplantation or high-dose Ara-C is underscored. The disease-free survival chances after autologous bone marrow transplantation are comparable with those published for allogeneic bone marrow transplantation; however, disease-free survival of the patients receiving a high-dose Ara-C intensification regimen is not significantly worse than that seen after autologous bone marrow transplantation.

摘要

63例非随机分组的急性髓性白血病成人患者接受了以伊达比星为基础的方案治疗。达到完全缓解的患者接受自体骨髓移植或(年龄>50岁或拒绝自体骨髓移植者)大剂量阿糖胞苷作为晚期强化治疗。52例患者(82.5%)达到完全缓解,45例在一个诱导疗程后缓解,其中16例在中位时间11个月后接受了自体骨髓移植。截至1997年12月(中位随访112个月,范围50 - 135个月),16例患者仍处于完全缓解状态(10例自体骨髓移植后,6例大剂量阿糖胞苷治疗后),29例复发(中位复发时间14个月,范围2 - 75个月)。4例患者在完全缓解期死亡。无病生存期的中位数为25个月;50个月和10年的无病生存率分别为41%和35%。在完全缓解持续超过11个月的自体骨髓移植和大剂量阿糖胞苷治疗的患者之间未观察到显著差异。自体移植患者120个月后无病生存期的中位数尚未达到(50个月和10年的无病生存机会均为67%)。年龄是白血病复发的唯一预测变量。这些长期结果证实了含伊达比星方案的抗白血病疗效,该方案导致高完全缓解率并对无病生存期产生有利影响。此外,强调了自体骨髓移植或大剂量阿糖胞苷晚期强化治疗的疗效。自体骨髓移植后的无病生存机会与同种异体骨髓移植报道的相当;然而,接受大剂量阿糖胞苷强化方案患者的无病生存期并不比自体骨髓移植后显著更差。

相似文献

1
Long-term results in non randomized patients with acute myelogenous leukemia: a single institution experience.急性髓性白血病非随机分组患者的长期结果:单机构经验
Ann Ital Med Int. 1998 Jul-Sep;13(3):146-51.
2
Chemotherapy compared with autologous or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in the management of acute myeloid leukemia in first remission.化疗与自体或异基因骨髓移植在初治缓解期急性髓系白血病治疗中的比较。
N Engl J Med. 1998 Dec 3;339(23):1649-56. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199812033392301.
3
Use of peripheral blood stem cells for autologous transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia patients allows faster engraftment and equivalent disease-free survival compared with bone marrow cells.与骨髓细胞相比,在急性髓系白血病患者中使用外周血干细胞进行自体移植可实现更快的植入和相当的无病生存期。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 1999 Sep;24(5):467-72. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1701920.
4
A new combination of carboplatin, high-dose cytarabine and cross-over mitoxantrone or idarubicin for refractory and relapsed acute myeloid leukemia.卡铂、大剂量阿糖胞苷与交替使用米托蒽醌或伊达比星的新联合方案治疗难治性和复发性急性髓系白血病。
Haematologica. 1998 May;83(5):422-7.
5
Idarubicin in the therapy of acute myeloid leukemia: final analysis in 57 previously untreated patients.伊达比星治疗急性髓细胞白血病:57例初治患者的最终分析
Semin Oncol. 1993 Dec;20(6 Suppl 8):27-33.
6
Autologous or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation compared with intensive chemotherapy in acute myelogenous leukemia. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and the Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche Maligne dell'Adulto (GIMEMA) Leukemia Cooperative Groups.自体或异基因骨髓移植与急性髓性白血病强化化疗的比较。欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)和意大利成人恶性血液病研究组(GIMEMA)白血病协作组。
N Engl J Med. 1995 Jan 26;332(4):217-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199501263320403.
7
Multicentre phase III trial on fludarabine, cytarabine (Ara-C), and idarubicin versus idarubicin, Ara-C and etoposide for induction treatment of younger, newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia patients.氟达拉滨、阿糖胞苷(Ara-C)和伊达比星对比伊达比星、阿糖胞苷和依托泊苷用于年轻新诊断急性髓系白血病患者诱导治疗的多中心III期试验。
Br J Haematol. 2005 Oct;131(2):172-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05745.x.
8
Double reinforcement with fludarabine/high-dose cytarabine enhances the impact of autologous stem cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia patients.氟达拉滨/大剂量阿糖胞苷双重强化可增强自体干细胞移植对急性髓系白血病患者的疗效。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2001 Apr;27(8):829-35. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1703003.
9
Results of treatment with an intensive combination induction regimen containing idarubicin in children with acute myeloblastic leukemia: preliminary report of the Argentine Group for Treatment of Acute Leukemia.含去甲氧柔红霉素的强化联合诱导方案治疗儿童急性髓细胞白血病的结果:阿根廷急性白血病治疗小组的初步报告
Semin Oncol. 1993 Dec;20(6 Suppl 8):34-8.
10
Single-institution results of autologous bone marrow transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia.
Haematologica. 1995 Mar-Apr;80(2):136-41.