El-Sadr W M, Murphy R L, Yurik T M, Luskin-Hawk R, Cheung T W, Balfour H H, Eng R, Hooton T M, Kerkering T M, Schutz M, van der Horst C, Hafner R
Harlem Hospital Center and Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY 10037, USA.
N Engl J Med. 1998 Dec 24;339(26):1889-95. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199812243392604.
Although trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole is the drug of choice for the prevention of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, many patients cannot tolerate it and must switch to an alternative agent.
We conducted a multicenter, open-label, randomized trial comparing daily atovaquone (1500-mg suspension) with daily dapsone (100 mg) for the prevention of P. carinii pneumonia among patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus who could not tolerate trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. The median follow-up period was 27 months.
Of 1057 patients enrolled, 298 had a history of P. carinii pneumonia. P. carinii pneumonia developed in 122 of 536 patients assigned to atovaquone (15.7 cases per 100 person-years), as compared with 135 of 521 in the dapsone group (18.4 cases per 100 person-years; relative risk for atovaquone vs. dapsone, 0.85; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.67 to 1.09; P=0.20). The relative risk of death was 1.07 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.89 to 1.30; P=0.45), and the relative risk of discontinuation of the assigned medication because of adverse events was 0.94 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.74 to 1.19; P=0.59). Among the 546 patients who were receiving dapsone at base line, the relative risk of discontinuation because of adverse events was 3.78 for atovaquone as compared with dapsone (95 percent confidence interval, 2.37 to 6.01; P<0.001); among those not receiving dapsone at base line, it was 0.42 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.30 to 0.58; P<0.001).
Among patients who cannot tolerate trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, atovaquone and dapsone are similarly effective for the prevention of P. carinii pneumonia. Our results support the continuation of dapsone prophylaxis among patients who are already receiving it. However, among those not receiving dapsone, atovaquone is better tolerated and may be the preferred choice for prophylaxis against P. carinii pneumonia.
尽管甲氧苄啶 - 磺胺甲恶唑是预防卡氏肺孢子虫肺炎的首选药物,但许多患者无法耐受,必须改用替代药物。
我们进行了一项多中心、开放标签、随机试验,比较每日服用阿托伐醌(1500毫克混悬液)与每日服用氨苯砜(100毫克)对无法耐受甲氧苄啶 - 磺胺甲恶唑的人类免疫缺陷病毒感染患者预防卡氏肺孢子虫肺炎的效果。中位随访期为27个月。
在1057名入组患者中,298人有卡氏肺孢子虫肺炎病史。在分配接受阿托伐醌治疗的536名患者中(每100人年15.7例),有122人发生了卡氏肺孢子虫肺炎,而在氨苯砜组的521名患者中有135人发生(每100人年18.4例;阿托伐醌与氨苯砜相比的相对风险为0.85;95%置信区间为0.67至1.09;P = 0.20)。死亡的相对风险为1.07(95%置信区间为0.89至1.30;P = 0.45),因不良事件而停用指定药物的相对风险为0.94(95%置信区间为0.74至1.19;P = 0.59)。在基线时接受氨苯砜治疗的546名患者中,阿托伐醌因不良事件而停用的相对风险与氨苯砜相比为3.78(95%置信区间为2.37至6.01;P<0.001);在基线时未接受氨苯砜治疗的患者中,该相对风险为0.42(95%置信区间为0.30至0.58;P<0.001)。
在无法耐受甲氧苄啶 - 磺胺甲恶唑的患者中,阿托伐醌和氨苯砜在预防卡氏肺孢子虫肺炎方面同样有效。我们的结果支持已接受氨苯砜预防治疗的患者继续使用氨苯砜。然而,在未接受氨苯砜治疗的患者中,阿托伐醌耐受性更好,可能是预防卡氏肺孢子虫肺炎的首选药物。