Suppr超能文献

[耳部爆炸伤的治疗方法]

[Therapeutic approach in blast injuries of the ear].

作者信息

Spremo S, Spirić S, Spirić P

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Clinical Centre, Banja Luka.

出版信息

Srp Arh Celok Lek. 1998 May-Jun;126(5-6):171-6.

PMID:9863376
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Otic blast injury is caused by arrhythmic air blast wave. The perforation of the tympanic membrane is the commonet finding associated with lacerations of mucosa in the middle ear. Makki [6] published 34 cases of myringoplasty after war blast injuries. However, healing of such perforations is common; Kerr [7] noted a healing rate of 83% after the blast injury. The aim of the study was to evaluate different therapic procedures of otic blast injuries. There were 74 patients with bilateral otic blast injuries, who underwent otomycroscopic examination. The following parameters were noted: Integrity of tympanic membrane and size of perforation, presence of haemorrhagic exudate in the middle ear and median value of conductive deafness (Table 2). Main symptoms, presented in Table 1 were: pain, deafness and otohaematorrhoea. The first group of 19 patients received antibiotics by parenteral way during 7 days according to the bacterial finding in ear exudate. Healing rate was dependent on the size of tympanic membrane perforation, and rated from 71% in perforation of one third of tympanic membrane to 25% in total perforation of tympanic membrane. Data are presented in Table 3. The second group of 24 patients received the same therapy as the first treatment, plus otomycroscopic removal of haemorrhagic exudate, lacerated middle ear mucosa, and repair of tympanic membrane lacerations. Healing rate was significantly better than the one obtained in the first group (Table 4). Persistent tympanic perforation, as indicator of failed therapy, was present in 5 (35%) of all examined ears with two thirds of tympanic membrane perforation in the first group, while in the second group the rate was 3 (12%). The third group received the same therapy as the second treatment, including administration of amicacyn into the external auditory canal. The results were statistically compared by chi 2 test, and we found that the second therapy protocol was significantly better. There was no significant difference between the second and the third therapy protocols. We found blast ruptures of tympanic membrane and auditory ossicles chain discontinuity in 88% of examined ears. In our material the high incidence of total tympanic membrane ruptures and subtotal ruptures (48%) is quite different in comparison to other authors [5-7]. We consider it as the effect of high power blast wave. Loss of conductive hearing was present in 91% of blast injured patients, while 7.4% of patients had mixed, predominantly senzoneural deafness. Consequently, in addition to mechanic blast injuries acoustic trauma could profoundly damage the inner ear. Spontaneous healing of tympanic membrane occurred in 71% of injured persons and this was a better result than the results obtained by other authors [3, 4, 6]. The spontaneous healing of tympanic membrane failed if infection of the middle ear occurred or blast caused the total tympanic membrane perforation. In the second and third therapy protocols significantly higher healing of tympanic membrane ruptures was evident; it rated from 88% to 91%. Better results could be explained by the effect of optimal healing conditions, based on removal of exudate from the middle ear and necrotic parts of tympanic membrane, completed by fitting of lacerated parts of tympanic membrane and antibiotic prophylaxis. Healing of tympanic membrane without scars and adhesions was more frequent than in patients treated only with antibiotics. Incidence of undesired outcome of persistent perforation of tympanic membrane was reduced. To prevent posttraumatic complications in the middle ear, we recommend early cleaning of margins, reposition of lacerated fragments of tympanic membrane, and removal of haemorrhagic exudate. Myringoplasty should be performed if spontaneous healing of tympanic membrane did not occur after 6 months.

CONCLUSION

Otic blast injury was frequently found in war induced trauma. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

摘要

未标注

耳部爆震伤由不规则气浪冲击所致。鼓膜穿孔是中耳黏膜撕裂最常见的相关表现。马基[6]发表了34例战争爆震伤后鼓膜成形术的病例。然而,此类穿孔愈合较为常见;克尔[7]指出爆震伤后愈合率为83%。本研究旨在评估耳部爆震伤的不同治疗方法。74例双侧耳部爆震伤患者接受了耳显微镜检查。记录了以下参数:鼓膜完整性及穿孔大小、中耳出血性渗出物的存在情况以及传导性耳聋的中位数(表2)。表1中列出的主要症状为:疼痛、耳聋和耳出血。第一组19例患者根据耳渗出物中的细菌检测结果,接受了7天的静脉注射抗生素治疗。愈合率取决于鼓膜穿孔大小,鼓膜穿孔三分之一者愈合率为71%,鼓膜完全穿孔者愈合率为25%。数据见表3。第二组24例患者接受与第一组相同的治疗,外加耳显微镜下清除出血性渗出物、撕裂的中耳黏膜并修复鼓膜撕裂处。愈合率明显优于第一组(表4)。作为治疗失败指标的持续性鼓膜穿孔,在所有检查耳中占5例(35%),其中第一组鼓膜穿孔三分之二者占三分之二,而第二组该比例为3例(12%)。第三组接受与第二组相同的治疗,包括向外耳道内注入丁胺卡那霉素。通过卡方检验对结果进行统计学比较,我们发现第二种治疗方案明显更好。第二和第三种治疗方案之间无显著差异。我们发现88%的检查耳存在鼓膜爆震破裂和听小骨链中断。在我们的资料中,鼓膜完全破裂和大部破裂的高发生率(48%)与其他作者[5 - 7]相比有很大不同。我们认为这是高能量爆震波的作用。91%的爆震伤患者存在传导性听力损失,而7.4%的患者为混合性耳聋,以感音神经性耳聋为主。因此,除机械性爆震伤外,声创伤可能会严重损害内耳。71%的伤者鼓膜出现自发性愈合,这一结果优于其他作者[3, 4, 6]所获结果。如果中耳发生感染或爆震导致鼓膜完全穿孔,鼓膜的自发性愈合则会失败。在第二和第三种治疗方案中,鼓膜破裂的愈合率明显更高;为88%至91%。更好的结果可以通过基于清除中耳渗出物和鼓膜坏死部分、修复鼓膜撕裂部分以及抗生素预防的最佳愈合条件来解释。鼓膜无瘢痕和粘连的愈合比仅接受抗生素治疗的患者更为常见。持续性鼓膜穿孔这一不良结果的发生率降低。为预防中耳创伤后并发症,我们建议早期清洁边缘、复位鼓膜撕裂碎片并清除出血性渗出物。如果鼓膜6个月后未发生自发性愈合,应进行鼓膜成形术。

结论

耳部爆震伤在战争所致创伤中较为常见。(摘要截断)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验