Glassman R B, Leniek K M, Haegerich T M
Department of Psychology, Lake Forest College, IL 60045, USA.
Brain Res Bull. 1998 Oct;47(3):249-56. doi: 10.1016/s0361-9230(98)00083-5.
Human participants were instructed to walk out along each of the arms of a 15-m in diameter, 8-arm radial maze once and only once. In order to approximate the circumstances under which laboratory rats remember visited sites, our human participants were asked to select arms in an unsystematic order. They scored an average of 7.6 to 7.8 correct choices, even if midway during a trial there was a 5-min interruption filled with a verbal-spatial interfering task (a scavenger hunt) or a 15-min interruption filled with a visuospatial task (a maze-running computer simulation). This finding extends our earlier research with humans in 13- or 17-arm radial mazes under nondelay conditions, in which we also found working memory (WM) capacity for about 7 to 9 places, the same as that of laboratory rats. We discuss earlier findings in other laboratories, showing that rats can successfully bridge long radial maze task interruptions of 5 or 8 h, and we compare our results also to those from studies in which human participants were not discouraged from reducing memory load by responding systematically in radial mazes. Because the radial maze task takes minutes to complete even under nondelay conditions its routine consideration as a working memory task in the animal literature alters the assumptions often made about the duration of WM in the human literature. Accumulating empirical findings about place-memory in humans, nonhuman mammals, and birds suggest it might be productive to reevaluate this theoretical issue with respect to present knowledge about the roles of the hippocampus and other brain structures in declarative memory and in procedural or implicit memory, while considering the hypothesis that some forms of information may exploit long-term memory in parallel with working memory.
研究人员指示人类参与者沿着一个直径为15米的8臂放射状迷宫的每条臂各走一次,且只能走一次。为了模拟实验大鼠记住已探索地点的情况,要求我们的人类参与者以不系统的顺序选择臂。他们平均做出了7.6至7.8个正确选择,即使在试验中途有一个持续5分钟的言语空间干扰任务(寻宝游戏)或一个持续15分钟的视觉空间任务(迷宫运行计算机模拟)的干扰。这一发现扩展了我们早期在无延迟条件下对人类在13臂或17臂放射状迷宫中的研究,在该研究中我们也发现了对大约7至9个地点的工作记忆(WM)能力,与实验大鼠相同。我们讨论了其他实验室的早期发现,这些发现表明大鼠能够成功跨越5或8小时的长放射状迷宫任务中断,并且我们还将我们的结果与那些在放射状迷宫中没有阻止人类参与者通过系统反应来减轻记忆负荷的研究结果进行了比较。因为即使在无延迟条件下,放射状迷宫任务也需要几分钟才能完成,所以在动物文献中它被常规地视为一种工作记忆任务,这改变了人类文献中关于工作记忆持续时间的常见假设。关于人类、非人类哺乳动物和鸟类的地点记忆的实证研究结果不断积累,这表明根据目前关于海马体和其他脑结构在陈述性记忆以及程序性或隐性记忆中的作用的知识,重新评估这个理论问题可能是有成效的,同时考虑到某些形式的信息可能会与工作记忆并行利用长期记忆的假设。