Hongo F, Nakanouchi T, Nakamura J, Azuma Y, Iida A, Inoue W, Okihara K, Watanabe M, Saitoh M, Watanabe H, Konishi E, Ashihara T
Department of Urology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine.
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 1998 Nov;89(11):871-5. doi: 10.5980/jpnjurol1989.89.871.
The efficacy of the reduction time (tau) after castration as a prognostic factor was examined by comparing to Gleason score.
The change of prostatic volume after castration was observed from the castration to 3 months after in 24 cases of prostatic cancer. Prostatic volume was examined by transrectal ultrasonography of the prostate. Survival curves was calculated by Kaplan-Meier method. Differences among survival curves were analyzed using Cox-Mantel test.
tau had a close relationship to the prognosis of each case (Wilcoxon test: p < 0.05, Cox-Mantel test: p < 0.05). Gleason score had a weak relationship to prognosis (Wilcoxon test: N. S., Cox-Mantel test: p < 0.05).
tau was efficient as prognostic factor compared to Gleason score.