Stewart J R, Thompson M B
Faculty of Biological Science, University of Tulsa, Oklahoma 74104, USA.
J Exp Zool. 1998;282(4-5):535-59.
Models for the evolution of placentation among squamate reptiles have been strongly influenced by early work on one lineage of Australian scincid lizards: one of three lineages that include species with specialized allantoplacentation. The discovery of two types of complex allantoplacentae among species currently assigned to the Eugongylus species group led Weekes ([1935] Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 2:625-645) to propose that a graded evolutionary sequence was exemplified by the morphological series of allantoplacental types that existed among Australian skinks. One of the model's strengths is the incorporation of testable inferences of the relationship between placental structure and function. However, descriptions of placental structure for some species are incomplete and subsequent taxonomic revisions have resulted in confusion concerning the species studied. One of the ambiguities is the identity of Lygosoma weekesae (Kinghorn [1929] Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W., 54:32-33), one of two species for which the most specialized type of allantoplacenta was defined. The distinguishing characteristic of this placental type is the presence of a structure known as a placentome. Subsequent to the original species description, Lygosoma weekesae was named a synonym for Pseudemoia spenceri (Rawlinson [1974] Mem. Natn. Mus. Vict., 35:87-96), yet the placental description (Weekes [1929] Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W., 54:34-60) is thought to be of Niveoscincus coventryi (Rawlinson [1975] Mem. Natn. Mus. Vic., 36:1-16). We describe placental ontogeny of N. coventryi and P. spenceri as a contribution to study of comparative placentation among lygosomatine skinks. We conclude that the placental description for L. weekesae could not have been N. coventryi, because a placentome is not a component of the allantoplacenta of N. coventryi. Further, the allantoplacenta of this species does not conform to previously defined categories for Eugongylus group skinks. The allantoplacenta of P. spenceri contains a placentome that is structurally congruous with the original description of placentation for L. weekesae (Weekes [1929] Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W., 54:34-60). Comparison of extraembryonic membrane and placental structure among the four viviparous and one oviparous species of Eugongylus group skinks for which data are available shows that each species exhibits characters that distinguish it from other species, while additional characters are shared among all, or some, species. Based on a recent phylogenetic hypothesis, the distribution of allantoplacental types among these species does not support Weekes' ([1935] Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 2:625-645) model of a graded sequence for the evolution of squamate placentation.
有鳞目爬行动物胎盘形成的进化模型,受到早期对澳大利亚石龙子科蜥蜴一个谱系研究工作的强烈影响:这是三个包含具有特殊尿囊胎盘物种的谱系之一。在目前归入真宫蜥物种组的物种中发现了两种类型的复杂尿囊胎盘,这使得威克斯([1935]《伦敦动物学会学报》,2:625 - 645)提出,澳大利亚石龙子中存在的尿囊胎盘类型的形态系列体现了一个渐变的进化序列。该模型的优势之一在于纳入了关于胎盘结构与功能关系的可检验推断。然而,一些物种的胎盘结构描述并不完整,随后的分类学修订导致了对所研究物种的混淆。其中一个模糊之处在于威氏棱蜥(金霍恩[1929]《新南威尔士林奈学会学报》,54:32 - 33)的身份,它是被定义为具有最特殊类型尿囊胎盘的两个物种之一。这种胎盘类型的显著特征是存在一种被称为胎盘小叶的结构。在最初的物种描述之后,威氏棱蜥被命名为斯氏伪蜥(罗林森[1974]《维多利亚国家博物馆纪要》,35:87 - 96)的同义词,但胎盘描述(威克斯[1929]《新南威尔士林奈学会学报》,54:34 - 60)被认为是考氏白眉石龙子(罗林森[1975]《维多利亚博物馆纪要》,36:1 - 16)的。我们描述了考氏白眉石龙子和斯氏伪蜥的胎盘个体发育,作为对棱蜥亚科石龙子比较胎盘形成研究的贡献。我们得出结论,威氏棱蜥的胎盘描述不可能是考氏白眉石龙子的,因为胎盘小叶不是考氏白眉石龙子尿囊胎盘的组成部分。此外,该物种的尿囊胎盘不符合之前为真宫蜥属石龙子定义的类别。斯氏伪蜥的尿囊胎盘包含一个胎盘小叶,其结构与威氏棱蜥胎盘形成的原始描述(威克斯[1929]《新南威尔士林奈学会学报》,54:34 - 60)一致。对真宫蜥属石龙子四个胎生物种和一个卵生物种的胎膜和胎盘结构进行比较,现有数据表明每个物种都有将其与其他物种区分开来的特征,同时所有或一些物种之间也有其他共同特征。基于最近的系统发育假说,这些物种中尿囊胎盘类型的分布不支持威克斯([1935]《伦敦动物学会学报》,2:625 - 645)关于有鳞目胎盘进化渐变序列的模型。