Richardson A, van der Vies S M, Keppel F, Taher A, Landry S J, Georgopoulos C
Département de Biochimie Médicale, University of Geneva, 1 rue Michel-Servet, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.
J Biol Chem. 1999 Jan 1;274(1):52-8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.1.52.
Previous work has shown that the GroEL-GroES interaction is primarily mediated by the GroES mobile loop. In bacteriophage T4 infection, GroES is substituted by the gene 31-encoded cochaperonin, Gp31. Using a genetic selection scheme, we have identified a new set of mutations in gene 31 that affect interaction with GroEL; all mutations result in changes in the mobile loop of Gp31. Biochemical analyses reveal that the mobile loop mutations alter the affinity between Gp31 and GroEL, most likely by modulating the stability of the GroEL-bound hairpin conformation of the mobile loop. Surprisingly, mutations in groEL that display allele-specific interactions with mutations in gene 31 alter residues in the GroEL intermediate domain, distantly located from the mobile loop binding site. The observed patterns of genetic and biochemical interaction between GroES or Gp31 and GroEL point to a mechanism of genetic allele specificity based on compensatory changes in affinity of the protein-protein interaction. Mutations studied in this work indirectly alter affinity by modulating a folding transition in the Gp31 mobile loop or by modulating a hinged conformational change in GroEL.
先前的研究表明,GroEL与GroES的相互作用主要由GroES的活动环介导。在噬菌体T4感染过程中,GroES被基因31编码的共伴侣蛋白Gp31所取代。我们采用遗传筛选方案,在基因31中鉴定出一组影响其与GroEL相互作用的新突变;所有突变均导致Gp31活动环的改变。生化分析表明,活动环突变改变了Gp31与GroEL之间的亲和力,很可能是通过调节活动环与GroEL结合时发夹构象的稳定性来实现的。令人惊讶的是,与基因31中的突变表现出等位基因特异性相互作用的groEL突变,改变了GroEL中间结构域中远离活动环结合位点的残基。GroES或Gp31与GroEL之间观察到的遗传和生化相互作用模式,指向了一种基于蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用亲和力补偿性变化的遗传等位基因特异性机制。本研究中所研究的突变通过调节Gp31活动环的折叠转变或调节GroEL的铰链构象变化,间接改变了亲和力。