Lazarus D D, Hudson D A, van Zyl J E, Fleming A N, Fernandes D
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Groote Schuur Hospital and University of Cape Town, South Africa.
Ann Plast Surg. 1998 Dec;41(6):587-94. doi: 10.1097/00000637-199812000-00002.
Repair of unilateral cleft lip is a challenging procedure with no single technique satisfactory for all types of unilateral cleft deformity. This study compares retrospectively five techniques of unilateral cleft lip repair in 72 children (45 boys, 27 girls). Twenty-two children had a Millard rotation-advancement repair, 5 children had a Davies Z-plasty, 22 had a modified Z-plasty, 10 had a Tennison-Randall triangular flap repair, and 13 had a Nakajima-Yoshimura straight-line repair. Assessment was performed clinically by a plastic surgeon not involved in the original surgery. Repairs were assessed objectively by measurement of the vertical length of both the repaired and normal sides of the lip with calipers. Subjective criteria used to evaluate the repair were the symmetry of Cupid's bow, the quality of scar, the alignment of white roll, the evenness of the vermilion, and the lip pout. The mean follow-up period was 5.4 years (range, 9 months-29 years). Sixty-five of the 72 repairs measured (90%) were within two standard deviations (SDs) of normal and thus were considered to be of "acceptable" length. Seven repairs were unacceptably short (>2 SDs) on measurement, six of which included a rotation-advancement repair for a complete cleft lip. Subjective results paralleled the objective results. The outcome following repair of unilateral cleft lip was similar for all five surgical methods assessed except for complete cleft lips repaired by the rotation-advancement technique, which tended to result in an unacceptably short lip as measured on the repaired side.
单侧唇裂修复是一项具有挑战性的手术,没有一种单一技术能适用于所有类型的单侧唇裂畸形。本研究回顾性比较了72例儿童(45例男孩,27例女孩)的五种单侧唇裂修复技术。22例儿童接受了米勒德旋转推进修复术,5例接受了戴维斯Z成形术,22例接受了改良Z成形术,10例接受了坦尼森 - 兰德尔三角瓣修复术,13例接受了中岛 - 吉村直线修复术。由未参与原手术的整形外科医生进行临床评估。通过用卡尺测量修复侧和正常侧唇部的垂直长度来客观评估修复情况。用于评估修复的主观标准包括丘比特弓的对称性、瘢痕质量、白唇缘对齐情况、唇红的平整度以及唇部突度。平均随访期为5.4年(范围为9个月至29年)。72例测量的修复中有65例(90%)在正常范围的两个标准差内,因此被认为长度“可接受”。7例修复在测量时长度过短(超过2个标准差),其中6例包括用于完全性唇裂的旋转推进修复术。主观结果与客观结果一致。除了采用旋转推进技术修复的完全性唇裂外,评估的所有五种手术方法修复单侧唇裂后的结果相似,旋转推进技术修复的完全性唇裂在修复侧测量时往往导致唇部过短而不可接受。