Suppr超能文献

临床实验室常规中 HLA-DR 分型的血清学和分子(PCR-SSP)技术比较

Comparison of serological and molecular (PCR-SSP) techniques of HLA-DR typing in clinical laboratory routine.

作者信息

Woszczek G, Borowiec M, Miś M, Górska M, Kowalski M L

机构信息

Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Medical University of Lódź, Poland.

出版信息

Ann Transplant. 1997;2(1):39-42.

PMID:9869840
Abstract

Advances in molecular biology techniques allowed for introduction of PCR-based methods for HLA typing. In routine HLA typing for organ transplantation serological method is still being used as a standard, although molecular techniques are applied more and more often. The aim of our study was to compare HLA-DR typing using traditional serological method and PCR-SSP methodology in routine clinical laboratory. HLA-DR typing was performed using standard microcytotoxicity assay and PCR-SSP method in 28 patients referred to our Transplantation Immunology Unit for HLA typing. Comparison of results obtained by both methods revealed no discrepancies in 5 patients, in 12 patients the PCR-SSP typing showed additional DR antigens or splits of antigens. In 11 patients serological typing turned out to be impossible because of technical problems. Molecular PCR typing allowed for precise antigen determination in all the patients. Comparing both methods we found PCR-SSP HLA typing method very useful in routine HLA-DR determination, especially valuable in patients, in whom some problems in serological testing are expected.

摘要

分子生物学技术的进步使得基于聚合酶链反应(PCR)的人类白细胞抗原(HLA)分型方法得以引入。在器官移植的常规HLA分型中,血清学方法仍被用作标准方法,尽管分子技术的应用越来越频繁。我们研究的目的是在常规临床实验室中比较使用传统血清学方法和聚合酶链反应-序列特异性引物(PCR-SSP)方法进行HLA-DR分型的情况。对28名转诊至我们移植免疫科进行HLA分型的患者,采用标准微量细胞毒性试验和PCR-SSP方法进行HLA-DR分型。两种方法所得结果比较显示,5名患者结果无差异,12名患者的PCR-SSP分型显示出额外的DR抗原或抗原分裂。11名患者因技术问题无法进行血清学分型。分子PCR分型能够在所有患者中精确确定抗原。比较两种方法,我们发现PCR-SSP HLA分型方法在常规HLA-DR检测中非常有用,尤其对于预计血清学检测会出现一些问题的患者具有重要价值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验