• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

听神经瘤手术中听力保留的意义。

Significance of hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma surgery.

作者信息

Ishikawa K, Yasui N, Mineura K, Sasajima H, Togawa K

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, Akita University School of Medicine, Japan.

出版信息

Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1998;537:16-9. doi: 10.1080/00016489850182297-1.

DOI:10.1080/00016489850182297-1
PMID:9870643
Abstract

In the past 10 years, 43 patients with acoustic neuroma have been operated on by the middle cranial fossa approach. In all cases, meticulous care was taken to preserve the cochlear function regardless of the degree of preoperative hearing disorder. Thirty-nine of 43 patients had various degrees of residual hearing, hearing was preserved in 16 of these (41%). The best result was obtained in patients with a tumor located less than 1 cm from the porus. The hearing preservation rate was 64% (11/17). The patients recovered hearing acuity quite well, especially at low frequencies in 2 cases who had a pure tone hearing level of more than 50 dB and less than 50% of speech discrimination. These 2 cases had a history of sudden deafness that was intractable 5 months preoperatively. Thus it is not correct to set certain criteria for hearing preservation for patients whose preoperative hearing may not be serviceable.

摘要

在过去10年中,43例听神经瘤患者接受了中颅窝入路手术。在所有病例中,无论术前听力障碍程度如何,均精心护理以保留耳蜗功能。43例患者中有39例有不同程度的残余听力,其中16例(41%)听力得以保留。肿瘤距内耳道小于1 cm的患者获得了最佳结果。听力保留率为64%(11/17)。患者听力恢复良好,尤其是2例纯音听力水平超过50 dB且言语辨别率低于50%的患者,低频听力恢复较好。这2例患者术前5个月有突发性耳聋病史且难以治疗。因此,为术前听力可能无法使用的患者设定某些听力保留标准是不正确的。

相似文献

1
Significance of hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma surgery.听神经瘤手术中听力保留的意义。
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1998;537:16-9. doi: 10.1080/00016489850182297-1.
2
Hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma surgery: importance of adhesion between the cochlear nerve and the tumor.听神经瘤手术中的听力保留:蜗神经与肿瘤之间粘连的重要性。
J Neurosurg. 2002 Aug;97(2):337-40. doi: 10.3171/jns.2002.97.2.0337.
3
Hearing preservation after acoustic neuroma surgery with intraoperative direct eighth cranial nerve monitoring: Part II. A classification of results.听神经瘤手术中使用术中直接第八颅神经监测的听力保留:第二部分。结果分类。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1986 Oct;95(3 Pt 1):285-91. doi: 10.1177/01945998860953P104.
4
[Hearing preservation and tinnitus following removal of acoustic neurinomas].[听神经瘤切除术后的听力保留与耳鸣]
No Shinkei Geka. 1996 Apr;24(4):329-34.
5
Hearing preservation after acoustic neuroma surgery using intraoperative direct eighth cranial nerve monitoring.使用术中第八颅神经直接监测进行听神经瘤手术后的听力保留
Am J Otol. 1985 Nov;Suppl:99-106.
6
Hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma surgery: value of monitoring cochlear nerve action potentials.听神经瘤手术中的听力保留:监测蜗神经动作电位的价值
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994 Dec;111(6):703-9. doi: 10.1177/019459989411100602.
7
Hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma surgery.听神经瘤手术中的听力保留
Laryngoscope. 1992 Feb;102(2):125-8. doi: 10.1288/00005537-199202000-00004.
8
[Acoustic neuromas and serviceable hearing: choosing the surgical approach].[听神经瘤与可保留听力:手术入路的选择]
Neurochirurgie. 2002 Dec;48(6):479-86.
9
Hearing conservation in acoustic neuroma surgery via the posterior fossa.经后颅窝听神经瘤手术中的听力保护
J Laryngol Otol. 1990 Jun;104(6):463-7. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100112897.
10
Preservation of hearing in patients undergoing excision of acoustic neuromas and other cerebellopontine angle tumors.听神经瘤及其他桥小脑角肿瘤切除患者听力的保留
J Neurosurg. 1985 Aug;63(2):168-74. doi: 10.3171/jns.1985.63.2.0168.

引用本文的文献

1
Hearing improvement after vestibular schwannoma surgery in the era of the hearing preservation rule - case report and literature review.听力保留原则时代前庭神经鞘瘤手术后的听力改善——病例报告及文献综述
Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2022 Sep;166(3):347-352. doi: 10.5507/bp.2021.067. Epub 2021 Dec 9.