Suppr超能文献

面罩、喉罩以及带套囊口咽气道自主通气时的生理死腔/潮气量比值

Physiological dead space/tidal volume ratio during face mask, laryngeal mask, and cuffed oropharyngeal airway spontaneous ventilation.

作者信息

Casati A, Fanelli G, Torri G

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Milan, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Anesth. 1998 Dec;10(8):652-5. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(98)00108-1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the physiological dead space/tidal volume ratio and arterial to end-tidal carbon dioxide tension (ETCO2) difference during spontaneous ventilation through a face mask, a laryngeal mask (LMA), or a cuffed oropharyngeal airway.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, cross-over study.

SETTING

Inpatient anesthesia at a university department of orthopedic surgery.

PATIENTS

20 ASA physical status I and II patients, without respiratory disease, who underwent ankle and foot surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

After a peripheral nerve block was performed, propofol anesthesia was induced and then maintained with a continuous intravenous (i.v.) infusion (4 to 6 mg/kg/h). A face mask, a cuffed oropharyngeal airway, or an LMA were placed in each patient in a random sequence. After 15 minutes of spontaneous breathing through each of the airways, ventilatory variables, as well as arterial, end-tidal, and mixed expired CO2 partial pressure, were measured, and physiological dead space/tidal volume ratio was calculated.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Expired minute volume and respiratory rate (RR) were lower with LMA (5.6 +/- 1.2 L/min and 18 +/- 3 breaths/min) and the cuffed oropharyngeal airway (5.7 +/- 1 L/min and 18 +/- 3 breaths/min) than the face mask (7.1 +/- 0.9 L/min and 21 +/- 3 breaths/min) (p = 0.0002 and p = 0.013, respectively). Physiological dead space/tidal volume ratio and arterial to end tidal CO2 tension difference were similar with the cuffed oropharyngeal airway (3 +/- 0.4 mmHg and 4.4 +/- 1.4 mmHg) and LMA (3 +/- 0.6 mmHg and 3.7 +/- 1 mmHg) and lower than with the face mask (4 +/- 0.5 mmHg and 6.7 +/- 2 mmHg) (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Because of the increased dead space/tidal volume ratio, breathing through a face mask required higher RR and expired minute volume than either the cuffed oropharyngeal airway or LMA, which, in contrast, showed similar effects on the quality of ventilation in spontaneously breathing anesthetized patients.

摘要

目的

比较通过面罩、喉罩(LMA)或带套囊口咽气道进行自主通气时的生理死腔/潮气量比值以及动脉血与呼气末二氧化碳分压(ETCO2)差值。

设计

前瞻性、随机、交叉研究。

地点

某大学骨科住院麻醉科。

患者

20例美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况为I级和II级、无呼吸系统疾病且接受踝足部手术的患者。

干预措施

实施外周神经阻滞后,诱导丙泊酚麻醉,然后通过持续静脉输注(4至6mg/kg/h)维持麻醉。按随机顺序为每位患者放置面罩、带套囊口咽气道或LMA。在通过每种气道进行15分钟自主呼吸后,测量通气变量以及动脉血、呼气末和混合呼出二氧化碳分压,并计算生理死腔/潮气量比值。

测量指标及主要结果

使用LMA(5.6±1.2L/分钟和18±3次/分钟)和带套囊口咽气道(5.7±1L/分钟和18±3次/分钟)时的呼出分钟通气量和呼吸频率(RR)低于面罩(7.1±0.9L/分钟和21±3次/分钟)(p分别为0.0002和0.013)。带套囊口咽气道(3±0.4mmHg和4.4±1.4mmHg)和LMA(3±0.6mmHg和3.7±1mmHg)的生理死腔/潮气量比值以及动脉血与呼气末二氧化碳分压差值相似,且低于面罩(4±0.5mmHg和6.7±2mmHg)(p分别为0.0001和0.001)。

结论

由于死腔/潮气量比值增加,通过面罩呼吸比带套囊口咽气道或LMA需要更高的RR和呼出分钟通气量,相比之下,后两者对自主呼吸麻醉患者的通气质量显示出相似的影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验