Hoffmann R, Lethen H, Marwick T, Rambaldi R, Fioretti P, Pingitore A, Picano E, Buck T, Erbel R, Flachskampf F A, Hanrath P
Medical Clinic I, RWTH Aachen, Germany.
Am J Cardiol. 1998 Dec 15;82(12):1520-4. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00697-3.
Subjective interpretation of dobutamine echocardiograms provides only moderate interinstitutional observer agreement if nonunified data acquisition and assessment criteria are applied. The present study was undertaken to evaluate parameters associated with low interinstitutional observer agreement in the interpretation of dobutamine echocardiograms and to analyze whether standardized interpretation criteria improve interinstitutional observer agreement. One hundred fifty dobutamine echocardiograms (dobutamine up to 40 microg/kg/min body weight and atropine up to 1 mg) were evaluated at 5 centers. Clinical, procedural, and echocardiographic parameters were included in the analysis of variables with significant impact on interinstitutional agreement. Standardized interpretative criteria were established, and 90 dobutamine echocardiograms were reanalyzed by 3 observers using a standardized image display. Multivariate analysis demonstrated low image quality (odds ratio [OR] 0.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08 to 0.45, p=0.0002), low severity of induced wall motion abnormality (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.40, p <0.0001), and a low peak rate-pressure product (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.43 to 2.27, p=0.0382) to result in a low interinstitutional agreement. Standardization of image display in cine loop format and of dobutamine stress echo interpretation criteria resulted in improvement in test result categorization as normal or abnormal, with a kappa value of 0.50, compared with 0.39 using the original subjective interpretation. In conclusion, image quality, the severity of induced wall motion abnormalities, and the obtained rate-pressure product have a significant impact on the interpretation homogeneity of dobutamine echocardiograms. Standardization of image display in cine loop format and of reading criteria results in improved interinstitutional agreement in interpretation of stress echocardiograms.
如果应用不统一的数据采集和评估标准,多巴酚丁胺超声心动图的主观解读仅能提供中等程度的机构间观察者一致性。本研究旨在评估与多巴酚丁胺超声心动图解读中机构间观察者一致性较低相关的参数,并分析标准化解读标准是否能提高机构间观察者一致性。在5个中心对150例多巴酚丁胺超声心动图(多巴酚丁胺剂量高达40μg/kg/分钟体重,阿托品剂量高达1mg)进行了评估。对机构间一致性有显著影响的变量分析纳入了临床、操作和超声心动图参数。建立了标准化的解读标准,3名观察者使用标准化图像显示对90例多巴酚丁胺超声心动图进行了重新分析。多变量分析显示,图像质量低(优势比[OR]0.19,95%置信区间[CI]0.08至0.45,p = 0.0002)、诱发的室壁运动异常严重程度低(OR 0.17,95%CI 0.07至0.40,p <0.0001)以及峰值速率-压力乘积低(OR 0.93,95%CI 0.43至2.27,p = 0.0382)会导致机构间一致性较低。电影环格式的图像显示和多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图解读标准的标准化导致正常或异常的检测结果分类得到改善,kappa值为0.50,而使用原始主观解读时为0.39。总之,图像质量、诱发的室壁运动异常严重程度以及获得的速率-压力乘积对多巴酚丁胺超声心动图的解读同质性有显著影响。电影环格式的图像显示和解读标准的标准化可提高负荷超声心动图解读中的机构间一致性。