Suppr超能文献

[术前辅助检查医嘱的评估]

[Evaluation of preoperative complementary examination ordering].

作者信息

Diouf E, Kane O, Beye M, Diop M, Ndiaye F, Sall-Ka B

机构信息

Département d'Anesthésie-Réanimation CHU A. Le Dantec Dakar.

出版信息

Dakar Med. 1998;43(1):1-4.

PMID:9874593
Abstract

The ordering of tests is often done in a systematical way. In spite of the studies which have proved that these tests are not useful, and despite the advice of the SFAR (1992) the ordering remains excessive, and is a source of expenses for the population. In that study we have done an evaluation for the ordering of preoperative tests in our structure and we have tried to see if the advice of the SFAR were followed, if they were sufficient to modify the habits of ordering the tests.

摘要

检查项目的安排通常是系统进行的。尽管有研究证明这些检查并无用处,尽管法国麻醉与重症监护学会(SFAR,1992年)也给出了相关建议,但检查项目的安排仍然过多,这对民众来说是一笔开支。在该项研究中,我们对本机构术前检查项目的安排进行了评估,并试图了解是否遵循了SFAR的建议,以及这些建议是否足以改变检查项目安排的习惯。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验