Adelman J U, Brod A, Von Seggern R L, Mannix L K, Rapoport A M
Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA.
Cephalalgia. 1998 Nov;18(9):605-11. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1998.1809605.x.
Newer acute care migraine medications demonstrate improved rapidity of action, consistent effectiveness, excellent safety profiles, and rarely cause rebound headaches. Their use could decrease the need for migraine-preventive medication. The present analysis derives a formula that can be used by practitioners to determine the cost-effectiveness of various migraine-preventive medications relative to selected acute-care medications. We propose a measure called the cost-equivalent number (CEN), the number of headaches per month at which the cost of the preventive medication equals the cost savings in acute-care treatment realized by using the preventive medication. The use of the CEN individualizes the decision of whether to use a migraine-preventive medication, weighing both the efficacy and cost of the preventive medication against the cost of the acute-care medication. A CEN lower than the migraine frequency suggests that use of a preventive medication will be cost-effective.
新型急性偏头痛治疗药物起效更快、疗效稳定、安全性良好,且很少引起反弹性头痛。使用这些药物可能会减少预防性偏头痛药物的使用需求。本分析得出了一个公式,可供从业者用于确定各种预防性偏头痛药物相对于选定急性治疗药物的成本效益。我们提出了一种称为成本等效数量(CEN)的衡量方法,即每月头痛次数达到一定程度时,预防性药物的成本等于使用预防性药物在急性治疗中实现的成本节约。使用CEN可以个性化决定是否使用预防性偏头痛药物,权衡预防性药物的疗效和成本与急性治疗药物的成本。CEN低于偏头痛发作频率表明使用预防性药物具有成本效益。