Dean M C
Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, University College London, UK.
Arch Oral Biol. 1998 Dec;43(12):1009-21. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9969(98)00069-7.
The spacing of short-period incremental markings in dentine was measured in longitudinal ground sections and in longitudinal demineralized silver-stained sections of permanent human canines and premolars. Measurements were made (i) within 50 microm from the granular layer of Tomes (GLT), (ii) between 100 and 200 microm from the GLT, and (iii) in the axial plane of the tallest cusps. Median values for the spacing of calcospheritic lines closest to the GLT in the ground sections increased from 1.8 to 2.8 microm as the lines gradually coalesced into a laminar pattern beyond the GLT pulpally. Median values for the spacing of short-period lines in the cuspal dentine, where dentine formation is known to be fastest, were 4.1 microm. Markings in the demineralized sections were between 25 and 39% closer together, presumably due to contraction and shrinkage during specimen preparation. The spacings of short-period incremental lines measured on ground sections of non-human primate dentine (gibbon, siamang, orang) and on pig dentine, all between 100 and 200 microm from the GLT, clustered between 2.5 and 3.5 microm. Apart from gibbon dentine (in which spacings were closer together in this position than in the others), the distribution of measurements was not significantly different in pig, orang or human dentine. However, none of the data for the comparative samples presented here revealed spacings of short-period lines anywhere close to the 16 microm previously reported for circumpulpal dentine in animals. These data suggest that there may be many other animals where the mode and, to some extent, rate of dentine mineralization close to the root surface follows a common pattern. While data for the spacing of incremental markings in dentine provide no evidence for their periodicity, it is clear that the measurements made in the ground sections match the reported daily rates of mineralization at these locations, whereas those in demineralized silver-stained sections do not. Tissue shrinkage is probably a better explanation for this than the generally accepted view that they represent 12 h increments of dentine mineralization. This study provides a better basis for identifying and describing these lines, and for distinguishing them from other kinds of incremental markings in dentine.
在纵向磨片以及永久性人类犬齿和前磨牙的纵向脱矿银染切片中,测量了牙本质中短周期增量标记的间距。测量在以下部位进行:(i) 距离托姆斯颗粒层(GLT)50微米以内;(ii) 距离GLT 100至200微米之间;(iii) 在最高牙尖的轴向平面内。在磨片中,最靠近GLT的球间线间距的中位数从1.8微米增加到2.8微米,因为这些线在牙髓侧逐渐合并成层状模式。在已知牙本质形成最快的牙尖牙本质中,短周期线间距的中位数为4.1微米。脱矿切片中的标记间距彼此靠近25%至39%,推测这是由于标本制备过程中的收缩和缩小所致。在非人类灵长类动物牙本质(长臂猿、合趾猿、猩猩)的磨片以及猪牙本质上,距离GLT 100至200微米处测量的短周期线间距聚集在2.5至3.5微米之间。除了长臂猿牙本质(在此位置其间距比其他位置更紧密)外,猪、猩猩或人类牙本质的测量分布没有显著差异。然而,此处给出的比较样本数据均未显示短周期线的间距在任何地方接近先前报道的动物环牙髓牙本质的16微米。这些数据表明,可能还有许多其他动物,其靠近牙根表面的牙本质矿化模式以及在一定程度上的矿化速率遵循共同模式。虽然牙本质中增量标记间距的数据没有为其周期性提供证据,但很明显,在磨片中进行的测量与这些位置报道的每日矿化速率相符,而在脱矿银染切片中的测量则不相符。对此,组织收缩可能比普遍接受的观点(即它们代表牙本质矿化的12小时增量)是更好的解释。本研究为识别和描述这些线以及将它们与牙本质中的其他类型增量标记区分开来提供了更好的基础。