Sachs B D, Liu Y C
Psychology Graduate Degree Program, University of Connecticut, Storrs 06269-1020, USA.
Physiol Behav. 1998 Dec 1;65(3):413-21. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9384(98)00192-9.
In three experiments, reflexive erection in male rats was facilitated by housing the males for 2 min with inaccessible sexually receptive females. In Experiment 1, males were sexually naive or experienced and received two reflexive erection tests, 1 week apart, immediately after the males were exposed to receptive females, to unreceptive females, or to no females (n = 8 per group). In both tests, experienced males exposed to estrous females had the shortest reflexive erection latencies; in Test 1 the differences among groups were of borderline significance (p = 0.057), but in Test 2 the differences among groups were highly reliable (p<0.01). Further analysis indicated that only experienced males exposed to receptive females were significantly different from other groups. In Experiment 2, sexually experienced males (n = 11) received four reflexive erection tests: after being with no female, and 0, 5, or 10 min after exposure to estrous females. As the interval between exposure and test increased, the males had progressively shorter erection latencies (p<0.01) and more intense glans erections (p<0.03). Experiments 1 and 2 may be viewed as demonstrating the psychogenic facilitation of reflexive erections. In Experiment 3, males underwent sham surgery (sham, n = 10) or bilateral transection of the hypogastric nerves (HgNx, n = 10), which are conventionally viewed as mediating psychogenic erection. After males mounted a receptive female for 5 min without intromission or had 2 min of non-contact exposure to receptive females, the males had shorter erection latencies (p<0.001) and more erections (p<0.02). These facilitative effects of pretest stimulation were unaffected by HgN transection. During copulation tests, HgNx males had longer ejaculation latencies (p<0.05) and lower intromission ratios (p<0.05), possible signs of impaired erectile function. However, in Experiment 4, other males were tested twice for reflexive erection and copulation after sham (n = 8) or HgNx (n = 9) surgery, and there were no significant effects of surgery on reflexive erection or copulatory behavior. Collectively, these experiments indicate (a) that brief noncontact exposure of sexually experienced males to estrous females facilitates reflexive erection, (b) that this facilitation increases for at least 10 min after the females are removed, and (c) that the hypogastric nerves do not mediate these facilitative effects. The evidence for a role for the HgN in copulation was inconclusive.
在三项实验中,将雄性大鼠与无法接触到的性接受期雌性交配2分钟,可促进雄性大鼠的反射性勃起。在实验1中,雄性大鼠为性幼稚或有性经验的,在接触接受期雌性、非接受期雌性或不接触雌性(每组n = 8)后,相隔1周接受两次反射性勃起测试。在两项测试中,接触动情期雌性的有性经验雄性大鼠的反射性勃起潜伏期最短;在测试1中,组间差异接近显著水平(p = 0.057),但在测试2中,组间差异非常可靠(p<0.01)。进一步分析表明,只有接触接受期雌性的有性经验雄性大鼠与其他组有显著差异。在实验2中,有性经验的雄性大鼠(n = 11)接受了四次反射性勃起测试:在不接触雌性后,以及接触动情期雌性后0、5或10分钟。随着接触与测试之间的间隔增加,雄性大鼠的勃起潜伏期逐渐缩短(p<0.01),龟头勃起更强烈(p<0.03)。实验1和2可被视为证明了反射性勃起的心理性促进作用。在实验3中,雄性大鼠接受假手术(假手术组,n = 10)或双侧切断腹下神经(腹下神经切断组,n = 10),传统上认为腹下神经介导心理性勃起。在雄性大鼠与接受期雌性交配5分钟但无插入动作,或与接受期雌性进行2分钟非接触暴露后,雄性大鼠的勃起潜伏期缩短(p<0.001),勃起次数增加(p<0.02)。测试前刺激的这些促进作用不受腹下神经切断的影响。在交配测试中,腹下神经切断组的雄性大鼠射精潜伏期更长(p<0.05),插入比例更低(p<0.05),这可能是勃起功能受损的迹象。然而,在实验4中,其他雄性大鼠在假手术(n = 8)或腹下神经切断手术(n = 9)后进行了两次反射性勃起和交配测试,手术对反射性勃起或交配行为没有显著影响。总体而言,这些实验表明:(a)有性经验的雄性大鼠与动情期雌性进行短暂非接触暴露可促进反射性勃起;(b)在移除雌性后,这种促进作用至少持续10分钟;(c)腹下神经不介导这些促进作用。关于腹下神经在交配中的作用的证据尚无定论。