Malament K A, Socransky S S
Department of Graduate Prosthodontics, Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Mass, USA.
J Prosthet Dent. 1999 Jan;81(1):23-32. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(99)70231-3.
There are no long-term data on Dicor glass-ceramic restoration survival in the human oral cavity and the effect that different technical and clinical variables have on survival.
This prospective study examined the relationship of different clinical parameters on the survival of Dicor glass-ceramic restorations in the human oral cavity.
A total of 417 subjects (from 17 to 91 years of age) participated. All subjects required single unit fixed prosthodontics in any area of the mouth and/or 3-unit fixed partial dentures or cantilevered anterior restorations. They were offered the option of a gold or conventional metal-ceramic restoration, or a Dicor restoration with potentially improved esthetic results, better wear characteristics, and diminished oral plaque accumulation. Overall survival of the restorations was determined and the effect of various clinical parameters evaluated with Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Log rank tests were used to determine statistically significant differences among parameters.
For the 1444 units placed, 188 failures were recorded. Total time at risk for the units was 7319 years providing an estimated risk of 2.45% per year. Probabilities of survival of "typical" acid-etched Dicor and nonacid-etched Dicor restorations were 76% and 50%, respectively, at 14.1 years (P <.001). Probabilities of survival of typical acid-etched and nonacid-etched Dicor complete coverage restorations were virtually identical to those observed in the full data set. There was a 2.2 times greater risk of failure associated with the use of nonacid-etched Dicor complete coverage than acid-etched restorations (P <.01). Complete coverage restoration survival was highest in the incisor region and decreased to the molars in both arches. Second molars showed the highest failure rate. No complete coverage restorations failed on lateral incisors during the entire study. Probability of survival of a typical acid-etched Dicor complete coverage restoration in male subjects was 71%, and 75% for female subjects at 14.1 years (P <.01). The major difference appeared to be due to a greater failure rate in the maxillary arch of the male. Survivor functions of acid-etched Dicor complete coverage restorations for subjects in <33 years, 33 to 52 years, and 52 years age groups were 88% at 9 years, 62% at 14 years, and 82% at 14 years, respectively.
Dicor restorations can survive successfully over time with certain reservations. Long-term survival improved significantly when restorations were acid-etched before luting. Complete coverage restoration failures per year decreased from molars to incisors in both arches, suggesting that complete coverage restorations on molars represented a serious risk. No Dicor complete coverage restoration on lateral incisors failed during the study. Restorations failed less often in female than male subjects.
目前尚无关于Dicor玻璃陶瓷修复体在人体口腔中的长期存留数据,以及不同技术和临床变量对其存留率的影响。
本前瞻性研究旨在探讨不同临床参数与Dicor玻璃陶瓷修复体在人体口腔中存留率之间的关系。
共有417名受试者(年龄在17至91岁之间)参与。所有受试者均需要在口腔任何区域进行单单位固定义齿修复和/或3单位固定局部义齿修复或悬臂式前牙修复。他们可以选择金修复体或传统金属烤瓷修复体,或者Dicor修复体,后者可能具有更好的美学效果、更优的磨损特性以及减少口腔菌斑堆积的优点。确定修复体的总体存留率,并使用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线评估各种临床参数的影响。采用对数秩检验来确定参数之间的统计学显著差异。
在放置的1444个单位修复体中,记录到188个失败案例。这些单位修复体的总风险时间为7319年,估计每年的风险为2.45%。在14.1年时,“典型”酸蚀Dicor修复体和非酸蚀Dicor修复体的存留概率分别为76%和50%(P <.001)。典型酸蚀和非酸蚀Dicor全冠修复体的存留概率与整个数据集观察到的结果几乎相同。使用非酸蚀Dicor全冠修复体的失败风险比酸蚀修复体高2.2倍(P <.01)。全冠修复体在切牙区域的存留率最高,在两个牙弓中从切牙到磨牙逐渐降低。第二磨牙的失败率最高。在整个研究期间,侧切牙上的全冠修复体均未失败。在14.1年时,男性受试者中典型酸蚀Dicor全冠修复体的存留概率为71%,女性受试者为75%(P <.01)。主要差异似乎是由于男性上颌牙弓的失败率更高。年龄<33岁、33至52岁和52岁以上年龄组的酸蚀Dicor全冠修复体的生存函数在9年时分别为88%、在14年时为62%以及在14年时为82%。
Dicor修复体在一定条件下可以长期成功存留。在粘结前进行酸蚀可显著提高长期存留率。两个牙弓中全冠修复体每年的失败率从磨牙到切牙逐渐降低,这表明磨牙上的全冠修复体存在严重风险。在研究期间,侧切牙上的Dicor全冠修复体均未失败。女性受试者中修复体失败的频率低于男性。