Pauli P, Wiedemann G, Montoya P
Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Germany.
J Anxiety Disord. 1998 Nov-Dec;12(6):555-65. doi: 10.1016/s0887-6185(98)00033-4.
Covariation estimates (CEs) between fear-relevant (FR) stimuli (slides of airplane crash sites) or fear-irrelevant (FI) stimuli (slides of airplanes in flight or mushrooms) and an aversive outcome (electrical shock) were examined in 15 flight phobics (high-fear participants) and 15 non-flight-phobic individuals (low-fear participants) by means of an illusory correlation experiment. In spite of a random relationship between all slide categories and outcome (illusory correlation), flight phobics exhibited a covariation bias and showed higher CEs for the contingency between FR slides and shocks than for the contingency between FI slides and shocks in a first experimental block. The CEs of flight phobics for FR slides and shocks was significantly higher than that of non-flight-phobic individuals, while high- and low-fear participants did not differ in their CEs for the other slide-shock combinations. However, even high-fear individuals were able to correct their initial covariation bias in subsequent illusory correlation blocks, presumably based on disconfirming situational information.
通过一个错觉关联实验,在15名飞行恐惧症患者(高恐惧参与者)和15名非飞行恐惧症患者(低恐惧参与者)中,研究了与恐惧相关(FR)的刺激(飞机坠毁现场幻灯片)或与恐惧无关(FI)的刺激(飞行中的飞机或蘑菇幻灯片)与厌恶结果(电击)之间的协变估计(CEs)。尽管所有幻灯片类别与结果之间是随机关系(错觉关联),但在第一个实验块中,飞行恐惧症患者表现出协变偏差,并且与FI幻灯片和电击之间的偶然性相比,他们对FR幻灯片和电击之间的偶然性表现出更高的CEs。飞行恐惧症患者对FR幻灯片和电击的CEs显著高于非飞行恐惧症患者,而高恐惧和低恐惧参与者在其他幻灯片 - 电击组合的CEs上没有差异。然而,即使是高恐惧个体在随后的错觉关联块中也能够根据不一致的情境信息纠正他们最初的协变偏差。