Forde K, Hillberg-Seitzinger A, Dargatz D, Wineland N
Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80523, USA.
Prev Vet Med. 1998 Dec 1;37(1-4):209-17. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5877(98)00092-0.
Knowledge about the patterns of animal movement--particularly feeder-cattle movement--within the USA is necessary in order to anticipate how diseases might be spread geographically. This study was conducted to explore the availability of interstate-level movement data which might be used to develop a more coherent national picture of interstate feeder-cattle movement. State Statistical Offices of the National Agricultural Statistics Service, 1996 (NASS) and Departments of Agriculture in all 50 states were contacted to determine the type of information collected regarding the import and export of feeder cattle. Eighteen of the 50 states contacted recorded updated import and export information by using certificates of veterinary inspection and (occasionally) entry permits for verification. The 18 states were: Alabama, Colorado, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Texas, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. Profiles of import and export data from Kansas, Texas, Colorado and Iowa (the primary receivers of 51% of total 1995 imports) were developed. These four states received at least 50% of their cattle imports from < 9 different states. As a result, approximately half of the nation's import movement can be explained by a total of 13 states and Mexico (excluding duplicates). Also, > 50% of the exports from Kansas, Texas, Colorado, and Iowa go to < or = 3 states. This import and export information confirms conclusions of others that cattle tend to move toward the center of the USA. However, if more states kept comprehensive, up-to-date records of movement information, knowledge about cattle-movement patterns in the USA would be importantly increased. The lack of specific notations on certificates of veterinary inspection can lead only to perceived trends; the present records have limited value in tracking animal movement.
了解美国境内动物的移动模式——尤其是育肥牛的移动模式——对于预测疾病可能如何在地理上传播是必要的。开展这项研究是为了探索州际层面移动数据的可用性,这些数据可用于更连贯地描绘全国育肥牛的州际移动情况。研究人员联系了国家农业统计局1996年的州统计局(NASS)以及所有50个州的农业部,以确定所收集的有关育肥牛进出口信息的类型。被联系的50个州中有18个州通过使用兽医检验证书和(偶尔)入境许可证进行核查来记录最新的进出口信息。这18个州分别是:阿拉巴马州、科罗拉多州、佛罗里达州、夏威夷州、爱达荷州、伊利诺伊州、印第安纳州、爱荷华州、堪萨斯州、马里兰州、马萨诸塞州、明尼苏达州、新泽西州、宾夕法尼亚州、得克萨斯州、西弗吉尼亚州、威斯康星州和怀俄明州。研究人员绘制了堪萨斯州、得克萨斯州、科罗拉多州和爱荷华州(这四个州接收了1995年总进口量的51%)的进出口数据概况。这四个州至少50%的牛进口来自不到9个不同的州。因此,美国大约一半的进口移动情况可以由总共13个州和墨西哥(不包括重复的)来解释。此外,堪萨斯州、得克萨斯州、科罗拉多州和爱荷华州超过50%的出口流向不到或等于3个州。这些进出口信息证实了其他人的结论,即牛倾向于向美国中部移动。然而,如果更多的州保留全面、最新的移动信息记录,那么关于美国牛移动模式的知识将得到显著增加。兽医检验证书上缺乏具体标注只能得出大致趋势;目前的记录在追踪动物移动方面价值有限。