北爱尔兰全科医生贫困地区补贴：现行制度公平吗？
General practitioner deprivation payments in Northern Ireland: is the current system equitable?
作者信息
O'Reilly D, Steele K
机构信息
Health and Social Care Research Unit, Queen's University of Belfast.
出版信息
Ulster Med J. 1998 Nov;67(2):99-103.
Abstract
The allocation of General practitioners deprivation payments has been a contentious issue since it was first proposed. This paper examines the method of allocation of such payments in Northern Ireland. A more equitable system would be based on enumeration districts, have a lower Jarman score and a closer relationship between Jarman score and remuneration. Unlike other parts of the UK these changes are now possible in Northern Ireland and should be implemented.
摘要
自首次提出以来，全科医生贫困地区补贴的分配一直是个有争议的问题。本文研究了北爱尔兰此类补贴的分配方法。一个更公平的系统将基于普查区，贾曼分数更低，且贾曼分数与薪酬之间的关系更紧密。与英国其他地区不同，这些改变在北爱尔兰现在是可行的，应该予以实施。
相似文献
1
General practitioner deprivation payments in Northern Ireland: is the current system equitable?北爱尔兰全科医生贫困地区补贴：现行制度公平吗？
Ulster Med J. 1998 Nov;67(2):99-103.
2
More equitable systems for allocating general practice deprivation payments: financial consequences.更公平的全科医疗贫困支付分配系统：财务影响
Br J Gen Pract. 1998 Jul;48(432):1405-7.
3
4
Analysis from inner London of deprivation payments based on enumeration districts rather than wards.基于枚举区而非选区对伦敦市中心贫困补贴的分析。
BMJ. 1995 Sep 23;311(7008):787-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7008.787.
5
Deprivation payments to general practitioners: limitations of census data.向全科医生支付的津贴：人口普查数据的局限性
BMJ. 1996 Sep 14;313(7058):669-70. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7058.669.
6
Deprivation payments should be based on enumeration districts.贫困补助金应基于普查区发放。
BMJ. 1996 Jan 20;312(7024):183-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7024.183c.
7
Deprivation payments revisited (again).重新审视（再一次）贫困补助金。
BMJ. 1996 Sep 14;313(7058):641-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7058.641.
8
Underprivileged areas and health care planning: implications of use of Jarman indicators of urban deprivation.贫困地区与医疗保健规划：使用贾曼城市贫困指标的影响
BMJ. 1991 Feb 16;302(6773):383-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6773.383.
9
Designing a deprivation payment for general practitioners: the UPA(8) wonderland.为全科医生设计一笔贫困补助金：UPA（8）的奇妙世界。
BMJ. 1991 Feb 16;302(6773):393-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6773.393.
本文引用的文献
1
2
3
Counting the cost of social disadvantage in primary care: retrospective analysis of patient data.计算初级医疗中社会劣势的代价：患者数据回顾性分析
BMJ. 1997 Jan 4;314(7073):38-42. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7073.38.
4
Deprivation payments to general practitioners: limitations of census data.向全科医生支付的津贴：人口普查数据的局限性
BMJ. 1996 Sep 14;313(7058):669-70. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7058.669.
5
Deprivation payments revisited (again).重新审视（再一次）贫困补助金。
BMJ. 1996 Sep 14;313(7058):641-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7058.641.
6
Deprivation payments should be based on enumeration districts.贫困补助金应基于普查区发放。
BMJ. 1996 Jan 20;312(7024):183-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7024.183c.
7
Using data from the 1991 census.使用1991年人口普查的数据。
BMJ. 1995 Jun 10;310(6993):1511-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6993.1511.
8
Analysis from inner London of deprivation payments based on enumeration districts rather than wards.基于枚举区而非选区对伦敦市中心贫困补贴的分析。
BMJ. 1995 Sep 23;311(7008):787-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7008.787.
9
Identification of underprivileged areas.贫困地区的识别。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983 May 28;286(6379):1705-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.286.6379.1705.
10
Does the underprivileged area index work?贫困地区指数有用吗？
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Sep 14;291(6497):709-11. doi: 10.1136/bmj.291.6497.709.
Zotero 插件