• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[静息能量消耗:间接测热法与菲克原理]

[Energy expenditure at rest: indirect calorimetry vs the Fick principle].

作者信息

Raurich Puigdevall J M, Ibáñez Juvé J

机构信息

Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Son Dureta, Palma de Mallorca, España.

出版信息

Nutr Hosp. 1998 Nov-Dec;13(6):303-8.

PMID:9889555
Abstract

UNLABELLED

The objectives of this study ere to assess the reproducibility of the energy expenditure at rest in patients with mechanical ventilation, using the indirect calorimetry method and the Fick principle, and to verify whether both methods of measuring the energy expenditure, are interchangeable. 15 critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation were studied. Each study consisted of the determination, in duplicate, of the energy expenditure at rest, using indirect calorimetry and the Fick principle. Each patient was studied on two occasions, thus yielding a total of 30 studies. The determination of the energy expenditure at rest using indirect calorimetry was carried out using an apparatus based on the closed circuit method (Calorimet), and the Fick principle was carried out using a thermodilution catheter placed in the pulmonary artery. The reproducibility coefficient of the indirect calorimetry method was 132 kcal/day, which is equivalent to 7% of the average energy expenditure at rest. The reproducibility coefficient of the Fick method was 344 kcal/day, which is equivalent to 18% of the average energy expenditure at rest. The difference between both methods, 6 +/- 50 kcal/day, was not significant. The corresponding limits in both methods were between-306 kcal/day and 294 kcal/day, which is equivalent to 15% of the average energy expenditure at rest.

CONCLUSIONS

The determination of the energy expenditure at rest using the Fick method, has a worse reproducibility coefficient that obtained by indirect calorimetry, but from a clinical point of view, both methods are interchangeable.

摘要

未标记

本研究的目的是使用间接测热法和菲克原理评估机械通气患者静息能量消耗的可重复性,并验证两种测量能量消耗的方法是否可互换。对15名接受机械通气的重症患者进行了研究。每项研究包括使用间接测热法和菲克原理重复测定静息能量消耗。对每位患者进行了两次研究,因此总共进行了30项研究。使用基于闭路法的仪器(Calorimet)通过间接测热法测定静息能量消耗,使用置于肺动脉的热稀释导管运用菲克原理进行测定。间接测热法的可重复性系数为132千卡/天,相当于静息平均能量消耗的7%。菲克法的可重复性系数为344千卡/天,相当于静息平均能量消耗的18%。两种方法之间的差异为6±50千卡/天,无显著性差异。两种方法相应的界限在-306千卡/天至294千卡/天之间,相当于静息平均能量消耗的15%。

结论

使用菲克法测定静息能量消耗的可重复性系数比间接测热法差,但从临床角度来看,两种方法是可互换的。

相似文献

1
[Energy expenditure at rest: indirect calorimetry vs the Fick principle].[静息能量消耗:间接测热法与菲克原理]
Nutr Hosp. 1998 Nov-Dec;13(6):303-8.
2
Predicted versus measured energy expenditure by continuous, online indirect calorimetry in ventilated, critically ill children during the early postinjury period.在受伤后早期,对通气的危重症儿童采用连续在线间接测热法预测与实测能量消耗情况。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2004 Jan;5(1):19-27. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000102224.98095.0A.
3
Energy expenditure and gas exchange measurements in postoperative patients: thermodilution versus indirect calorimetry.术后患者的能量消耗与气体交换测量:热稀释法与间接测热法
Crit Care Med. 1992 Sep;20(9):1273-83. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199209000-00014.
4
Validation of a predictive method for an accurate assessment of resting energy expenditure in medical mechanically ventilated patients.一种用于准确评估医学机械通气患者静息能量消耗的预测方法的验证
Crit Care Med. 2008 Apr;36(4):1175-83. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181691502.
5
The thermodilution technique for measuring resting energy expenditure does not agree with indirect calorimetry for the critically ill patient.用于测量危重症患者静息能量消耗的热稀释技术与间接测热法的结果不一致。
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1998 Nov-Dec;22(6):347-51. doi: 10.1177/0148607198022006347.
6
Clinical comparison of three methods to determine resting energy expenditure.三种测定静息能量消耗方法的临床比较
Nutr Clin Pract. 1994 Dec;9(6):241-6. doi: 10.1177/0115426594009006241.
7
A comparison between ventilation modes: how does activity level affect energy expenditure estimates?通气模式之间的比较:活动水平如何影响能量消耗估计值?
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2008 Mar-Apr;32(2):176-83. doi: 10.1177/0148607108314761.
8
Measured pulmonary oxygen consumption: difference between systemic oxygen uptake measured by the reverse Fick method and indirect calorimetry in cardiac surgery.测量的肺氧消耗:心脏手术中通过反向菲克法测量的全身氧摄取与间接量热法之间的差异。
Anaesthesia. 2005 Feb;60(2):146-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.04044.x.
9
[Indirect calorimetry in critical ill patients: validity of measurement for ten minutes].[危重症患者的间接测热法:十分钟测量的有效性]
Nutr Hosp. 2004 Mar-Apr;19(2):95-8.
10
Comparison of cardiac output determined by bioimpedance, thermodilution, and the Fick method.通过生物阻抗法、热稀释法和菲克法测定的心输出量比较。
Am J Crit Care. 2005 Jan;14(1):40-5.