Wood C, Maher P
Melbourne Gynoscopy, Victoria, Australia.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Nov;38(4):440-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1998.tb03107.x.
This review was undertaken to ascertain whether the low usage of laparoscopic surgery in gynaecology resulted from unacceptable complication rates and long operating times. The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery has been compared to that of laparotomy. Reports of controlled or comparative trials of laparoscopic gynaecological surgery for adhesions, infertility, ectopic pregnancy, oophorectomy, myomectomy and laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) have been reviewed between 1984 and 1997. Although further multicentre controlled trials may improve the assessment of complication rates for both laparotomy and laparoscopy procedures, laparoscopy appears to be as safe as laparotomy and generally has the advantage of shorter hospital stay and earlier return to normal activities. Except for LAVH, operating times of laparoscopic surgery are similar to that of laparotomy.
进行这项综述是为了确定妇科腹腔镜手术使用率低是否是由于不可接受的并发症发生率和较长的手术时间所致。已将腹腔镜手术的安全性和有效性与剖腹手术进行了比较。对1984年至1997年间关于腹腔镜妇科手术治疗粘连、不孕症、异位妊娠、卵巢切除术、子宫肌瘤切除术和腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术(LAVH)的对照或比较试验报告进行了综述。尽管进一步的多中心对照试验可能会改善对剖腹手术和腹腔镜手术并发症发生率的评估,但腹腔镜手术似乎与剖腹手术一样安全,并且通常具有住院时间短和能更早恢复正常活动的优势。除了LAVH,腹腔镜手术的手术时间与剖腹手术相似。