• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术(LAVH)与全子宫切除术(TAH)治疗子宫内膜癌的前瞻性队列研究。

Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) versus total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) in endometrial carcinoma: prospective cohort study.

机构信息

West Kent Cancer Centre, Maidstone Hospital, Kent, ME16 1QQ, UK.

出版信息

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010 May;20(4):570-5. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181d8b105.

DOI:10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181d8b105
PMID:20686375
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the feasibility and safety of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in the treatment of presumed stage I endometrial cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective cohort study without randomization of 182 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for early endometrial cancer or atypical hyperplasia at the West Kent Gynaecological Oncology Centre, UK. Seventy-four had laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO), and 108 had a total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Lymphadenectomy was performed in 153 patients, and lymph node sampling was performed in 2 patients. Twenty-seven patients with serous papillary endometrial cancer in addition had an omentectomy. The groups were compared for epidemiological and clinical characteristics, surgical outcomes, hospital stay, lymph node harvest, and intraoperative and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

The patients in the laparoscopy group had less blood loss, similar number of lymph nodes removed, less need for analgesia, and shorter hospital stay but longer operative time than those treated by laparotomy. In our study, we had 4 conversions (5.4%) from laparoscopy to laparotomy. Twenty-eight (41%) patients who had laparoscopic surgery were obese (body mass index [BMI] >30 kg/m2). Postoperative complications were more common in the laparotomy group (34%) than in the laparoscopy group (6%). No major complications occurred in the laparoscopy group. Wound infection was the most common complication in laparotomy patients, and this invariably happened to obese patients (BMI >30 kg/m2). There were 6 readmissions, all from the laparotomy group.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic surgery is a safe and reliable alternative to open surgery in the management of early endometrial cancer patients, with significantly reduced hospital stay and complications, especially in those patients with an elevated BMI.

摘要

目的

确定腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术治疗疑似 I 期子宫内膜癌的可行性和安全性。

研究设计

这是一项英国西肯特妇科肿瘤中心对 182 例连续早期子宫内膜癌或非典型增生患者进行的前瞻性队列研究,无随机分组。74 例行腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术和双侧输卵管卵巢切除术(BSO),108 例行全腹子宫切除术和双侧输卵管卵巢切除术。153 例行淋巴结切除术,2 例行淋巴结取样术。27 例浆液性乳头状子宫内膜癌患者加行网膜切除术。比较两组患者的流行病学和临床特征、手术结果、住院时间、淋巴结采集以及术中术后并发症。

结果

腹腔镜组患者出血量较少,切除的淋巴结数量相似,对镇痛的需求较少,住院时间较短,但手术时间较长。在我们的研究中,有 4 例(5.4%)从腹腔镜转为开腹。28 例(41%)腹腔镜手术患者肥胖(体重指数[BMI] >30 kg/m2)。腹腔镜组术后并发症(34%)较开腹组(41%)更为常见。腹腔镜组无重大并发症发生。开腹组患者中,切口感染最为常见,且均发生于肥胖患者(BMI >30 kg/m2)。有 6 例再次入院,均来自开腹组。

结论

腹腔镜手术是治疗早期子宫内膜癌患者的一种安全可靠的替代方法,可显著缩短住院时间和减少并发症,尤其适用于 BMI 较高的患者。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) versus total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) in endometrial carcinoma: prospective cohort study.腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术(LAVH)与全子宫切除术(TAH)治疗子宫内膜癌的前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010 May;20(4):570-5. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181d8b105.
2
Laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: comparison of patient outcomes.腹腔镜与经腹子宫切除术治疗子宫内膜癌:患者结局比较。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009 Nov;19(8):1370-6. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181a83db8.
3
Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗早期子宫内膜癌的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12(9):CD006655. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006655.pub2.
4
A Comparison of Outcomes Following Laparoscopic and Open Hysterectomy With or Without Lymphadenectomy for Presumed Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: Results From the Medical Research Council ASTEC Trial.腹腔镜与开腹子宫切除术加或不加淋巴结清扫术治疗疑似早期子宫内膜癌的疗效比较:医学研究委员会ASTEC试验结果
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 Oct;25(8):1424-36. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000521.
5
Impact of the lymphadenectomy in high-risk histologic types of endometrial cancer: a matched-pair study.高危组织学类型子宫内膜癌淋巴结切除术的影响:一项配对研究。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014 May;24(4):703-12. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000120.
6
Can Teamwork and High-Volume Experience Overcome Challenges of Lymphadenectomy in Morbidly Obese Patients (Body Mass Index of 40 kg/m2 or Greater) with Endometrial Cancer?: A Cohort Study of Robotics and Laparotomy and Review of Literature.团队合作和高手术量经验能否克服肥胖患者(BMI 大于或等于 40kg/m2)子宫内膜癌淋巴结切除术的挑战?:机器人手术与剖腹手术的队列研究及文献复习。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018 Jun;28(5):959-966. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001255.
7
Robotic-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial cancer compared with traditional laparoscopic and laparotomy approaches: a systematic review.机器人辅助子宫切除术与传统腹腔镜和剖腹手术治疗子宫内膜癌的比较:系统评价。
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Dec;116(6):1422-1431. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181f74153.
8
Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.良性妇科疾病的子宫切除术手术入路。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 29;8(8):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub6.
9
Comparative safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术与传统腹腔镜手术及剖腹手术治疗子宫内膜癌的比较安全性和有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Sep;42(9):1303-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.06.400. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
10
Lymphadenectomy or sentinel node biopsy for the management of endometrial cancer.用于子宫内膜癌治疗的淋巴结切除术或前哨淋巴结活检术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 10;6(6):CD015786. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015786.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical Outcomes in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy, Robotic-Assisted, and Laparoscopic-Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy for Uterine and Cervical Cancers: A Systematic Review.腹腔镜子宫切除术、机器人辅助手术及腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术治疗子宫癌和宫颈癌的手术结果:一项系统评价
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Dec 11;14(24):2782. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14242782.
2
Laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery vs conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜单孔手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗子宫内膜癌的系统评价和 Meta 分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Mar 26;100(12):e24908. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024908.
3
Controversies in the Management of Early-stage Serous Endometrial Cancer.
早期浆液性子宫内膜癌处理的争议
In Vivo. 2021 Mar-Apr;35(2):671-680. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12307.
4
Anesthesia considerations for robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology.妇科肿瘤机器人手术的麻醉考虑因素。
J Robot Surg. 2011 Dec;5(4):235-9. doi: 10.1007/s11701-011-0261-z. Epub 2011 Mar 25.
5
Differences in Epidural and Analgesic Use in Patients with Apparent Stage I Endometrial Cancer Treated by Open versus Laparoscopic Surgery: Results from the Randomised LACE Trial.开放性手术与腹腔镜手术治疗I期子宫内膜癌患者的硬膜外和镇痛使用差异:随机LACE试验结果
Minim Invasive Surg. 2013;2013:764329. doi: 10.1155/2013/764329. Epub 2013 Jul 14.
6
Endometrial cancer patients: a cohort previous to changes in tumour behaviour and treatment strategies.子宫内膜癌患者:肿瘤行为和治疗策略改变之前的队列研究。
ISRN Obstet Gynecol. 2011;2011:950460. doi: 10.5402/2011/950460. Epub 2011 Dec 18.