Uyl-de Groot C A, Touw C R
Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Anticancer Drugs. 1998 Nov;9(10):835-41. doi: 10.1097/00001813-199811000-00002.
Economic evaluation is a comparative analysis of alternatives in terms of both their costs and consequences. Therefore, the basic task of economic evaluation is to identify, measure, value and compare the costs and effects of the alternatives being considered. In this paper, the methodology of economic evaluation in general and in cancer in particular is reviewed and practical issues are illuminated. In the treatment of cancer patients not only survival and disease-free survival are important outcome parameters, but also quality of years alive. Hence, specific attention is given to the measurement and valuation of quality of life. Economic evaluation is intended to support health policy at different levels of decision making. In cancer treatment, health policy concerns both preventive, curative and palliative strategies, and decisions are often made at the micro and macro level. Economic evaluation can provide essential information on the costs and benefits of each option, and consequently on the optimal policy mix, and thus support decisions on the adoption and utilization of new treatments. Such information may assist policy makers in formulating regulatory policies and legislation, industry in developing products, health professionals in treating and serving patients, and consumers in making personal health decisions.
经济评估是对备选方案的成本和后果进行的比较分析。因此,经济评估的基本任务是识别、衡量、评估和比较所考虑备选方案的成本和效果。本文回顾了一般经济评估方法,特别是癌症领域的经济评估方法,并阐明了实际问题。在癌症患者的治疗中,不仅生存和无病生存是重要的结局参数,而且存活年份的质量也很重要。因此,本文特别关注生活质量的测量和评估。经济评估旨在为不同决策层面的卫生政策提供支持。在癌症治疗中,卫生政策涉及预防、治疗和姑息治疗策略,决策通常在微观和宏观层面做出。经济评估可以提供有关每个选项的成本和效益的基本信息,从而提供有关最佳政策组合的信息,进而支持有关采用和使用新治疗方法的决策。此类信息可协助政策制定者制定监管政策和立法,帮助行业开发产品,帮助卫生专业人员治疗和服务患者,并帮助消费者做出个人健康决策。