Chochinov H M, Kristjanson L
Department of Psychiatry, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
J Palliat Care. 1998 Winter;14(4):5-15.
The number of elderly Canadians is likely to double in 20 years, spurring a discussion of end-of-life care. We analyze the literature on the costs of this care and compare cost assessments of different models of palliative care. The cost of treatments for which there is little empirical support is factored into our cost-savings analysis and the methodological limits of cost-analysis studies are also discussed. We conclude that (a) depending upon the model of care, costs of end-of-life care are considerable, (b) costs of care become more expensive with distance from the home setting, (c) cost savings reported in palliative care settings may be a function of nearness to death; (d) family expenses on end-of-life care are substantial and are not factored into most cost-analysis studies, (e) a two-tiered system of palliative home care allows families with higher incomes to afford help in supporting home deaths, and (f) some treatments given to dying patients are costly while yielding little benefit.
加拿大老年人的数量在20年内可能会翻倍,这引发了关于临终护理的讨论。我们分析了有关这种护理成本的文献,并比较了不同姑息治疗模式的成本评估。几乎没有实证支持的治疗成本被纳入我们的成本节约分析中,同时也讨论了成本分析研究的方法局限性。我们得出以下结论:(a)根据护理模式的不同,临终护理的成本相当可观;(b)离家庭环境越远,护理成本越高;(c)姑息治疗环境中报告的成本节约可能是临近死亡的一个函数;(d)家庭在临终护理上的支出很大,而大多数成本分析研究并未将其考虑在内;(e)两级姑息家庭护理系统使收入较高的家庭有能力负担在家中协助病人死亡的费用;(f)给临终患者的一些治疗成本高昂,但收效甚微。