• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改变临终福利金资格标准——英格兰和威尔士的预算影响分析

Changing the eligibility criteria for welfare payments at the end of life - a budget impact analysis for England and Wales.

作者信息

Webb Edward J D, Meads David, Gardiner Clare

机构信息

Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK.

Health Sciences School, The University of Sheffield, Barber House Annexe, 387 Glossop Road, Sheffield, S10 2HQ, UK.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 4;21(1):421. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06390-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-021-06390-8
PMID:33947386
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8094542/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Terminal illness can cause a financial burden for many households. In England and Wales, fast-track access to welfare payments is available through special rules for the terminally ill (SRTI). Individuals are eligible for SRTI if they are judged to have 6 months or less to live. This criterion has been criticised as lacking a clinical basis, and being unfair for people with conditions where life-expectancy is difficult to accurately assess.

AIM

To conduct a budget impact analysis on the possible increase in expenditure of personal independence payments (PIP) following a change in England and Wales to SRTI so that everyone with a terminal illness is eligible.

METHODS

The fraction of individuals with a given long-term condition was estimated by combining data from the Health Survey for England, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) and the Department for Work and Pensions. Logistic growth modelling and ONS population projections were used to project PIP expenditure from 2020 to 2025. The increased expenditure was calculated for hypothetical scenarios which may occur following an SRTI regime change, specifically an increase of 1, 2 and 3 percentage points in the fraction of individuals claiming PIP under SRTI. Data from the literature on the projected prevalence of mild, moderate and severe dementia was used to calculate the cost if everyone with a given severity of dementia claimed PIP under SRTI.

RESULTS

Under the current SRTI regime, PIP expenditure under SRTI was projected to increase from £0.231bn in 2020 to £0.260bn in 2025, compared to equivalent figures of £11.1bn and £12.7bn under non-SRTI. Expenditure in 2025 following an increase in the fraction claiming of 1, 2 and 3 percentage points was projected to be £1.1bn, £1.9bn and £2.7bn respectively. In 2025, PIP expenditure was estimated to be £7.4bn if everyone with dementia claimed under SRTI, compared to £6.4bn if only individuals with moderate and severe dementia claimed, and £4.7bn if only individuals with severe dementia claimed.

CONCLUSION

Changes in SRTI are projected to lead to increases in PIP expenditure. However, the increased cost is small compared to expenditure under non-SRTI, especially as the highest costs were associated with extreme scenarios.

摘要

背景

晚期疾病会给许多家庭带来经济负担。在英格兰和威尔士,通过针对晚期患者的特殊规定(SRTI)可实现快速获得福利金。如果个人被判定存活时间为6个月或更短,则有资格享受SRTI。这一标准受到批评,因为缺乏临床依据,且对预期寿命难以准确评估的患者不公平。

目的

对英格兰和威尔士将SRTI变更为让所有晚期疾病患者都有资格享受之后个人独立支付(PIP)支出可能的增加进行预算影响分析。

方法

通过合并来自英格兰健康调查、国家统计局(ONS)和工作与养老金部的数据,估算患有特定长期疾病的个体比例。使用逻辑增长模型和ONS人口预测来预测2020年至2025年的PIP支出。针对SRTI制度变更后可能出现的假设情景计算增加的支出,具体而言,即SRTI下申领PIP的个体比例增加1、2和3个百分点的情况。利用文献中关于轻度、中度和重度痴呆症预计患病率的数据,计算如果患有特定严重程度痴呆症的所有人都在SRTI下申领PIP的成本。

结果

在当前的SRTI制度下,SRTI下的PIP支出预计将从2020年的2.31亿英镑增加到2025年的2.60亿英镑,而非SRTI下的相应数字为111亿英镑和127亿英镑。申领比例增加1、2和3个百分点后,2025年的支出预计分别为11亿英镑、19亿英镑和27亿英镑。2025年,如果所有痴呆症患者都在SRTI下申领,PIP支出估计为74亿英镑,若只有中度和重度痴呆症患者申领则为64亿英镑,若只有重度痴呆症患者申领则为47亿英镑。

结论

预计SRTI的变更将导致PIP支出增加。然而,与非SRTI下的支出相比,增加的成本较小,尤其是最高成本与极端情景相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7db2/8094542/01b4e02e70da/12913_2021_6390_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7db2/8094542/b513457fb0eb/12913_2021_6390_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7db2/8094542/aaf337cdbdf0/12913_2021_6390_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7db2/8094542/b3da37bca9b4/12913_2021_6390_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7db2/8094542/7072ec6d4d49/12913_2021_6390_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7db2/8094542/01b4e02e70da/12913_2021_6390_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7db2/8094542/b513457fb0eb/12913_2021_6390_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7db2/8094542/aaf337cdbdf0/12913_2021_6390_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7db2/8094542/b3da37bca9b4/12913_2021_6390_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7db2/8094542/7072ec6d4d49/12913_2021_6390_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7db2/8094542/01b4e02e70da/12913_2021_6390_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Changing the eligibility criteria for welfare payments at the end of life - a budget impact analysis for England and Wales.改变临终福利金资格标准——英格兰和威尔士的预算影响分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 4;21(1):421. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06390-8.
2
The effect of lengthening life expectancy on future pension and long-term care expenditure in England, 2007 to 2032.2007年至2032年预期寿命延长对英国未来养老金和长期护理支出的影响。
Health Stat Q. 2011 Winter(52):33-61. doi: 10.1057/hsq.2011.17.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Health care expenditures and ageing: an international comparison.医疗保健支出与老龄化:一项国际比较。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2003;2(1):9-16.
5
Public expenditure costs of carers leaving employment in England, 2015/2016.2015/2016年英格兰护理人员离职的公共支出成本。
Health Soc Care Community. 2018 Jan;26(1):e132-e142. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12486. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
6
Estimating the current and future costs of Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes in the UK, including direct health costs and indirect societal and productivity costs.估算英国 1 型和 2 型糖尿病的当前和未来成本,包括直接健康成本以及间接的社会和生产力成本。
Diabet Med. 2012 Jul;29(7):855-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03698.x.
7
What will the cardiovascular disease slowdown cost? Modelling the impact of CVD trends on dementia, disability, and economic costs in England and Wales from 2020-2029.心血管疾病放缓会带来什么代价?建模 2020-2029 年英格兰和威尔士心血管疾病趋势对痴呆症、残疾和经济成本的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 29;17(6):e0268766. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268766. eCollection 2022.
8
The economic impact of violence perpetration in severe mental illness: a retrospective, prevalence-based analysis in England and Wales.严重精神疾病中暴力行为的经济影响:基于回顾性研究和流行率的英格兰和威尔士分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Feb;5(2):e99-e106. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30245-2.
9
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
10
Temporal trend in dementia incidence since 2002 and projections for prevalence in England and Wales to 2040: modelling study.2002年以来英格兰和威尔士痴呆症发病率的时间趋势及到2040年患病率的预测:建模研究
BMJ. 2017 Jul 5;358:j2856. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j2856.

本文引用的文献

1
Drivers of care costs and quality in the last 3 months of life among older people receiving palliative care: A multinational mortality follow-back survey across England, Ireland and the United States.在接受姑息治疗的老年人生命最后 3 个月中,护理费用和质量的驱动因素:一项针对英格兰、爱尔兰和美国的多国死亡率随访调查。
Palliat Med. 2020 Apr;34(4):513-523. doi: 10.1177/0269216319896745. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
2
Comparison of financial support for family caregivers of people at the end of life across six countries: A descriptive study.六个国家临终患者家庭照护者经济支持比较:描述性研究。
Palliat Med. 2019 Oct;33(9):1189-1211. doi: 10.1177/0269216319861925. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
3
Socioeconomic position and use of healthcare in the last year of life: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
社会经济地位与生命终末期的医疗保健使用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2019 Apr 23;16(4):e1002782. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002782. eCollection 2019 Apr.
4
The costs of dementia in England.英格兰的痴呆症成本。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019 Jul;34(7):1095-1103. doi: 10.1002/gps.5113. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
5
The burden of family caregiving in the United States: work productivity, health care resource utilization, and mental health among employed adults.美国家庭护理负担:就业成年人的工作生产力、医疗资源利用及心理健康
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2017 Dec 6;10:437-444. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S135372. eCollection 2017.
6
Disparities In Cancer Care And Costs At The End Of Life: Evidence From England's National Health Service.癌症临终关怀和费用的差异:来自英国国家医疗服务体系的证据。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Jul 1;36(7):1218-1226. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0167.
7
Moving on: Factors associated with caregivers' bereavement adjustment using a random population-based face-to-face survey.继续前进:使用随机基于人群的面对面调查,与照顾者丧亲调整相关的因素。
Palliat Med. 2018 Jan;32(1):257-267. doi: 10.1177/0269216317717370. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
8
How many people will need palliative care in 2040? Past trends, future projections and implications for services.2040年将有多少人需要姑息治疗?过去的趋势、未来的预测以及对服务的影响。
BMC Med. 2017 May 18;15(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0860-2.
9
Losing a partner: the varying financial and practical impacts of bereavement in different sociodemographic groups.失去伴侣:不同社会人口群体在经济和实际方面的丧亲影响差异。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2020 Jun;10(2):e17. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2016-001215. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
10
Estimating the need for palliative care at the population level: A cross-national study in 12 countries.在人群层面评估姑息治疗需求:一项在12个国家开展的跨国研究。
Palliat Med. 2017 Jun;31(6):526-536. doi: 10.1177/0269216316671280. Epub 2016 Sep 28.