Ravaud P, Giraudeau B, Auleley G R, Drape J L, Rousselin B, Paolozzi L, Chastang C, Dougados M
Department of Rheumatology, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France.
Ann Rheum Dis. 1998 Oct;57(10):624-9. doi: 10.1136/ard.57.10.624.
(1) To assess reproducibility of medial knee joint space width (JSW) measurement in healthy subjects and osteoarthritic (OA) patients. (2) To define minimal relevant radiological change in knee JSW based on the reproducibility of its measurement.
(1) Healthy volunteers: in the first part of the study, 20 knees of healthy adult volunteers were radiographed in the weightbearing, anteroposterior extended view, twice, two weeks apart, using three different radiographic procedures: (a) without guidelines, (b) with guidelines and without fluoroscopy, (c) with guidelines and fluoroscopy. (2) Knee OA patients: in the second part of the study, 36 knees of OA patients were radiographed twice with guidelines and without fluoroscopy. JSW was measured blindly using a graduated magnifying glass. Based on the Bland and Altman graphic approach, cut off points defining minimal relevant radiological change are proposed.
Standard deviation (SD) of differences in JSW measurement between two sets of knee radiographs in healthy subjects were 0.66 mm for radiography performed without guidelines, 0.37 mm for radiography performed with guidelines and without fluoroscopy, and 0.31 mm for radiography with guidelines and fluoroscopy. SD of differences in JSW measurement in OA patients were 0.32 mm for radiography performed with guidelines and without fluoroscopy. A minimal relevant change in JSW between two radiographs performed in healthy subjects can be defined by a change of at least 1.29 or 0.59 mm when radiographs are taken without guidelines, and with guidelines and fluoroscopy, respectively. When radiographs are taken with guidelines and without fluoroscopy, the change must be at least 0.73 mm. A similar figure, 0.64 mm was observed in knee OA patients.
Definition of radiological progression varies greatly according to the radiographic procedure chosen. Use of guidelines reduces the threshold of progression required to consider that change between two measures is relevant.
(1)评估健康受试者和骨关节炎(OA)患者膝关节内侧间隙宽度(JSW)测量的可重复性。(2)根据测量的可重复性确定膝关节JSW的最小相关放射学变化。
(1)健康志愿者:在研究的第一部分,对20名健康成年志愿者的膝关节进行负重前后位伸展位X线摄影,分两次进行,间隔两周,采用三种不同的X线摄影程序:(a)无定位线;(b)有定位线且无透视;(c)有定位线且有透视。(2)膝关节OA患者:在研究的第二部分,对36名OA患者的膝关节进行两次有定位线且无透视的X线摄影。使用带刻度的放大镜进行JSW的盲法测量。基于Bland和Altman图形法,提出了定义最小相关放射学变化的截断点。
健康受试者两组膝关节X线片JSW测量差异的标准差,无定位线X线摄影为0.66mm,有定位线且无透视的X线摄影为0.37mm,有定位线且有透视的X线摄影为0.31mm。OA患者有定位线且无透视的X线摄影JSW测量差异的标准差为0.32mm。健康受试者两次X线摄影之间JSW的最小相关变化,无定位线时至少变化1.29mm,有定位线且有透视时至少变化0.59mm。有定位线且无透视时,变化必须至少为0.73mm。膝关节OA患者观察到类似数值,为0.64mm。
放射学进展的定义因所选的X线摄影程序差异很大。使用定位线降低了认为两次测量之间的变化具有相关性所需的进展阈值。