Revill S M, Morgan M D
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, U.K.
Respir Med. 1998 Aug;92(8):1053-8. doi: 10.1016/s0954-6111(98)90354-7.
Treatment for exercise induced asthma (EIA) in sporting competition is controlled to prevent the use of agents which might enhance physical performance. There is little information concerning the effects of the long-acting inhaled, and oral, sustained release type bronchodilators on the cardiorespiratory effects of submaximal exercise. The aim of this study was to compare the cardiorespiratory effects of submaximal exercise in patients with EIA before and after pretreatment with high-dose inhaled salmeterol xinafoate (SX) and controlled release oral salbutamol (CR). Patients were treated with SX (100 micrograms b.d.) and CR (8 mg b.d.) for > or = 3 days in a double-blind randomized cross-over design, with a 5-14 day washout period between treatments. A submaximal exercise test (total exercise time 6 min, final 3 min at 60% of VEpeak) was performed prior to each treatment period, and repeated at 1, 6, and 12 h postdose at the end of the treatment period. Two subjects were withdrawn from the study. Three subjects required relief medication after 1 h (CR) and one subject after 6 h (SX) and they did not perform further exercise tests. Both treatments increased baseline FEV1, with SX producing significantly greater pre-exercise bronchodilation than CR (P = 0.04). Following CR, there were no significant differences from the pretreatment values for VO2, VE, respiratory exchange ratio, heart rate, ventilatory equivalents for VO2, and oxygen pulse during the submaximal exercise challenge. Following SX, there were no significant differences for any of the exercise variables except for VE at 6 and 12 h (mean increase 4.27 l min-1 at 6 h, P < 0.01 and 4.69 l min-1 at 12 h, P = 0.05). The changes in ventilation following SX did not have an effect on oxygen consumption, and the ventilatory efficiency (VE/VO2) remained unchanged. The findings from this study demonstrate that, despite exercising from a higher baseline FEV1, short pretreatment periods with controlled release oral salbutamol and with inhaled salmeterol do not confer any cardiorespiratory advantage during submaximal exercise in subjects with EIA.
体育比赛中运动诱发哮喘(EIA)的治疗受到管控,以防止使用可能增强体能的药物。关于长效吸入型和口服缓释型支气管扩张剂对次最大运动心肺效应的影响,相关信息较少。本研究的目的是比较高剂量吸入沙美特罗昔萘酸盐(SX)和口服缓释沙丁胺醇(CR)预处理前后,EIA患者次最大运动的心肺效应。患者采用双盲随机交叉设计,接受SX(每日两次,每次100微克)和CR(每日两次,每次8毫克)治疗≥3天,治疗期间间隔5 - 14天的洗脱期。在每个治疗期之前进行一次次最大运动测试(总运动时间6分钟,最后3分钟为最大通气量峰值的60%),并在治疗期结束时给药后1、6和12小时重复进行。两名受试者退出研究。三名受试者在1小时后(CR)和一名受试者在6小时后(SX)需要缓解药物,他们未进行进一步的运动测试。两种治疗均增加了基线第一秒用力呼气量(FEV1),SX产生的运动前支气管扩张明显大于CR(P = 0.04)。CR治疗后,在次最大运动挑战期间,与预处理值相比,耗氧量(VO2)、每分钟静息通气量(VE)、呼吸交换率、心率、VO2通气当量和氧脉搏均无显著差异。SX治疗后,除6小时和12小时的VE外,任何运动变量均无显著差异(6小时平均增加4.27升/分钟,P < 0.01;12小时平均增加4.69升/分钟,P = 0.05)。SX治疗后通气的变化对耗氧量没有影响,通气效率(VE/VO2)保持不变。本研究结果表明,尽管从较高的基线FEV1开始运动,但在EIA受试者次最大运动期间,口服缓释沙丁胺醇和吸入沙美特罗的短期预处理并未带来任何心肺优势。