Suppr超能文献

沙美特罗用于慢性哮喘的常规治疗:严重不良事件

Regular treatment with salmeterol for chronic asthma: serious adverse events.

作者信息

Cates Christopher J, Cates Matthew J

机构信息

Community Health Sciences, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, UK, SW17 0RE.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16;2008(3):CD006363. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006363.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Epidemiological evidence has suggested a link between beta-agonists and increases in asthma mortality. There has been much debate about possible causal links for this association, and whether regular (daily) long-acting beta(2)-agonists are safe.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review is to assess the risk of fatal and non-fatal serious adverse events in trials that randomised patients with chronic asthma to regular salmeterol versus placebo or regular short-acting beta(2)-agonists.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Trials were identified using the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register of trials. Web sites of clinical trial registers were checked for unpublished trial data and FDA submissions in relation to salmeterol were also checked. The date of the most recent search was October 2007.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Controlled parallel design clinical trials on patients of any age and severity of asthma were included if they randomised patients to treatment with regular salmeterol and were of at least 12 weeks duration. Concomitant use of inhaled corticosteroids was allowed, as long as this was not part of the randomised treatment regimen.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently selected trials for inclusion in the review. Outcome data was extracted by one author and checked by the second author. Unpublished data on mortality and serious adverse events was sought.

MAIN RESULTS

The review includes 26 trials comparing salmeterol to placebo and 8 trials comparing with salbutamol. These included 62,630 participants with asthma (including 2,380 children). In 6 trials (2,766 patients), no serious adverse event data could be obtained. All cause mortality was higher with regular salmeterol than placebo but the increase was not significant, Odds Ratio 1.33 [95% CI: 0.85, 2.10]. Non-fatal serious adverse events were significantly increased when regular salmeterol was compared with placebo, Odds Ratio 1.14 [95% CI: 1.01, 1.28]. One extra serious adverse event occurred over 28 weeks for every 188 people treated with regular salmeterol [95% CI: 95 to 2606]. There is insufficient evidence to assess whether the risk in children is higher or lower than in adults. No significant increase in fatal or non-fatal serious adverse events was found when regular salmeterol was compared with regular salbutamol. Individual patient data from the SNS study have been combined with the results of the SMART study; in patients who were not taking inhaled corticosteroids, compared to regular salbutamol or placebo, there was a significant increase in risk of asthma-related death with regular salmeterol, Odds Ratio 9.52 [95% CI: 1.24, 73.09]. The confidence interval for patients taking inhaled corticosteroids is too wide to rule out an increase in asthma mortality in this group.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: In comparison with placebo, we have found an increased risk of serious adverse events with regular salmeterol. There is also a clear increase in risk of asthma-related mortality in patients not using inhaled corticosteroids in the two large surveillance studies. Although the increase in asthma-related mortality was smaller in patients taking inhaled corticosteroids at baseline, the confidence interval is wide, so it cannot be concluded that the inhaled corticosteroids abolish the risks of regular salmeterol. The adverse effects of regular salmeterol in children remain uncertain due to the small number of children studied.

摘要

背景

流行病学证据表明β受体激动剂与哮喘死亡率增加之间存在关联。关于这种关联的可能因果关系以及常规(每日)长效β₂受体激动剂是否安全,一直存在诸多争议。

目的

本综述的目的是评估在将慢性哮喘患者随机分为接受常规沙美特罗治疗与安慰剂或常规短效β₂受体激动剂治疗的试验中,致命和非致命严重不良事件的风险。

检索策略

通过Cochrane Airways Group专业试验注册库识别试验。检查临床试验注册网站以获取未发表的试验数据,并检查与沙美特罗相关的FDA提交资料。最近一次检索日期为2007年10月。

入选标准

纳入任何年龄和哮喘严重程度患者的对照平行设计临床试验,若试验将患者随机分配接受常规沙美特罗治疗且持续时间至少为12周。允许同时使用吸入性糖皮质激素,只要其不是随机治疗方案的一部分。

数据收集与分析

两位作者独立选择纳入综述的试验。结局数据由一位作者提取并由第二位作者检查。寻求关于死亡率和严重不良事件的未发表数据。

主要结果

本综述包括26项比较沙美特罗与安慰剂的试验以及8项比较沙美特罗与沙丁胺醇的试验。这些试验纳入了62,630例哮喘患者(包括2380名儿童)。在6项试验(2766例患者)中,无法获得严重不良事件数据。常规使用沙美特罗组的全因死亡率高于安慰剂组,但增加不显著,比值比为1.33 [95%可信区间:0.85, 2.10]。与安慰剂相比,常规使用沙美特罗时非致命严重不良事件显著增加,比值比为1.14 [95%可信区间:1.01, 1.28]。每188例接受常规沙美特罗治疗的患者在28周内会额外发生1例严重不良事件 [95%可信区间:95至2606]。没有足够证据评估儿童的风险是否高于或低于成人。与常规沙丁胺醇相比,未发现常规使用沙美特罗时致命或非致命严重不良事件有显著增加。SNS研究的个体患者数据已与SMART研究的结果合并;在未使用吸入性糖皮质激素的患者中,与常规沙丁胺醇或安慰剂相比,常规使用沙美特罗时哮喘相关死亡风险显著增加,比值比为9.52 [95%可信区间:1.24, 73.09]。使用吸入性糖皮质激素患者的可信区间过宽,无法排除该组哮喘死亡率增加的可能性。

作者结论

与安慰剂相比,我们发现常规使用沙美特罗会增加严重不良事件风险。在两项大型监测研究中,未使用吸入性糖皮质激素的患者哮喘相关死亡率也明显增加。尽管基线时使用吸入性糖皮质激素的患者哮喘相关死亡率增加幅度较小,但可信区间较宽,因此不能得出吸入性糖皮质激素可消除常规使用沙美特罗风险的结论。由于研究儿童数量较少,常规使用沙美特罗对儿童的不良影响仍不确定。

相似文献

7
Inhaled magnesium sulfate in the treatment of acute asthma.吸入硫酸镁治疗急性哮喘。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 28;11(11):CD003898. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003898.pub6.

引用本文的文献

2
Comparison of Two Therapies on Asthma Control in Children.两种疗法对儿童哮喘控制效果的比较。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol Pulmonol. 2020 Sep;33(3):127-135. doi: 10.1089/ped.2020.1196. Epub 2020 Aug 25.

本文引用的文献

10
Interactions between corticosteroids and beta2-agonists.皮质类固醇与β2受体激动剂之间的相互作用。
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2006 Oct-Dec;31(2-3):231-46. doi: 10.1385/CRIAI:31:2:231.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验