Suppr超能文献

绝经前乳腺癌风险以及教师和护士中已确定的乳腺癌风险因素模式。

Risk of premenopausal breast cancer and patterns of established breast cancer risk factors among teachers and nurses.

作者信息

Petralia S A, Vena J E, Freudenheim J L, Michalek A, Goldberg M S, Blair A, Brasure J, Graham S

机构信息

Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, USA.

出版信息

Am J Ind Med. 1999 Feb;35(2):137-41. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199902)35:2<137::aid-ajim5>3.0.co;2-a.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Contrasting results have been published regarding the risk of breast cancer among teachers and nurses. Confounding by reproductive factors may explain the increased risk observed among women in these occupations as information on those factors were not available in most studies.

METHODS

We examined the risk of premenopausal breast cancer among teachers and nurses using occupational histories in a case-control study where information on established risk factors was available.

RESULTS

Having ever held a teaching job was not related to breast cancer (OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.44-1.28) and women who worked for 10 years or less in this occupation had a non-significant deficit of risk (OR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.27-1.02). No elevation in risk was found in association with having ever been a nurse (OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.45-1.61) or with duration of nursing. Although direct comparison of established risk factors among teachers and nurses and other women in the study showed some evidence of differential distribution, especially when comparing teachers to other women, adjustment for reproductive variables and other breast cancer risk factors did not change the results of this study.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that teachers and nurses are not at an increased risk of breast cancer. This study also suggests that established risk factors for premenopausal breast cancer may not explain the elevation of risk found in other studies of teachers and nurses. However, this conclusion is limited by the fact that in the present study teachers and nurses had lower than expected breast cancer risk with or without adjustment for established risk factors. Limitations of this study such as low response rates and limited statistical power should be considered in the interpretation of these findings.

摘要

背景

关于教师和护士患乳腺癌的风险,已发表了相互矛盾的结果。生殖因素造成的混杂可能解释了在这些职业的女性中观察到的风险增加,因为在大多数研究中没有这些因素的相关信息。

方法

在一项病例对照研究中,我们利用职业史调查了教师和护士绝经前患乳腺癌的风险,该研究可获取已确定的风险因素的信息。

结果

曾经从事过教师工作与乳腺癌无关(比值比=0.74,95%置信区间=0.44-1.28),在该职业工作10年或更短时间的女性风险略有不足但无统计学意义(比值比=0.52,95%置信区间=0.27-1.02)。未发现曾经当过护士(比值比=0.85,95%置信区间=0.45-1.61)或护理时长与风险升高有关。尽管对研究中的教师、护士和其他女性之间已确定的风险因素进行直接比较显示出一些分布差异的证据,特别是在将教师与其他女性进行比较时,但对生殖变量和其他乳腺癌风险因素进行调整并没有改变本研究的结果。

结论

这些发现表明教师和护士患乳腺癌的风险没有增加。本研究还表明,绝经前乳腺癌的既定风险因素可能无法解释其他教师和护士研究中发现的风险升高。然而,这一结论受到以下事实的限制:在本研究中,无论是否对既定风险因素进行调整,教师和护士的乳腺癌风险都低于预期。在解释这些发现时应考虑本研究的局限性,如低应答率和统计效力有限。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验