• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

异基因外周血祖细胞移植的临床与经济学分析:加拿大视角

Clinical and economic analysis of allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cell transplants: a Canadian perspective.

作者信息

Couban S, Dranitsaris G, Andreou P, Price S, Tinker L, Foley R, Walker I R, Jamal S, Jamal N, Spaner D, Lipton J, Meharchand J, Messner H A

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Bone Marrow Transplant. 1998 Dec;22(12):1199-205. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1701504.

DOI:10.1038/sj.bmt.1701504
PMID:9894724
Abstract

Allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplants are an alternative to BMT, although G-CSF mobilization dose, timing of pheresis and risk of GVHD are not well defined. We compared harvest characteristics, donor and recipient outcomes and costs of two PBPC transplant strategies with historical controls who received BMT. Twenty donors mobilized with four daily s.c. G-CSF doses (5 microg/kg/day) (group 1) and 20 mobilized with 10 microg/kg/day G-CSF (group 2) were compared with 20 BM controls (group 3). G-CSF and phereses were well tolerated. Four of 40 PBPC donors required femoral catheter placement. At least 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+/kg recipient weight were collected with two phereses in 19/20 donors (group 1) and 18/20 donors (group 2). Time to neutrophil (18 vs 20 vs 22 days, P = 0.02) and platelet (21 vs 24 vs 27 days, P = 0.005) engraftment was shorter in the PBPC groups (group 2 vs group 1 vs group 3) but secondary engraftment outcomes were not different. The incidence of grade 2-4 aGVHD was higher in the low-dose G-CSF group (group 1) but there was no difference in cGVHD, 100-day or 1-year survival. The mean PBPC transplant cost (group 1) at first hospital discharge was less than BM (group 3) ($34,643 vs $37,354) but the mean overall cost for both groups was similar at 100 days ($46,334 vs $46,083). Allogeneic PBPC transplant with short course, low-dose G-CSF mobilization is safe, feasible and cost equivalent to allogeneic BMT.

摘要

异基因外周血祖细胞(PBPC)移植是骨髓移植(BMT)的一种替代方法,尽管粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)的动员剂量、单采时机和移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)风险尚未明确界定。我们将两种PBPC移植策略的采集特征、供者和受者的结局以及成本与接受BMT的历史对照进行了比较。20名供者通过每日皮下注射4次G-CSF剂量(5微克/千克/天)进行动员(第1组),20名供者通过10微克/千克/天的G-CSF进行动员(第2组),并与20名骨髓对照(第3组)进行比较。G-CSF和单采耐受性良好。40名PBPC供者中有4名需要放置股静脉导管。19/20名供者(第1组)和18/20名供者(第2组)通过两次单采收集到至少2.5×10⁶个CD34⁺/千克受者体重的细胞。PBPC组(第2组与第1组与第3组)中性粒细胞植入时间(18天对20天对22天,P = 0.02)和血小板植入时间(21天对24天对27天,P = 0.005)较短,但二次植入结局无差异。低剂量G-CSF组(第1组)2-4级急性移植物抗宿主病(aGVHD)的发生率较高,但慢性移植物抗宿主病(cGVHD)、100天或1年生存率无差异。首次出院时PBPC移植的平均成本(第1组)低于骨髓移植(第3组)(34,643美元对37,354美元),但两组在100天时的平均总成本相似(46,334美元对46,083美元)。采用短疗程、低剂量G-CSF动员的异基因PBPC移植是安全、可行的,且成本与异基因BMT相当。

相似文献

1
Clinical and economic analysis of allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cell transplants: a Canadian perspective.异基因外周血祖细胞移植的临床与经济学分析:加拿大视角
Bone Marrow Transplant. 1998 Dec;22(12):1199-205. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1701504.
2
[Collection of hematopoietic progenitor cells from healthy donors].[从健康供体采集造血祖细胞]
Acta Med Croatica. 2009 Jun;63(3):237-44.
3
[A pilot study of G-CSF mobilized allogeneic bone marrow cells plus peripheral blood stem cells transplantation for malignant hematological diseases].粒细胞集落刺激因子动员的异基因骨髓细胞加外周血干细胞移植治疗恶性血液病的初步研究
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2002 Oct 10;82(19):1306-9.
4
Enhanced antileukemic activity of allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cell transplants following donor treatment with the combination of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and stem cell factor (SCF) in a murine transplantation model.在小鼠移植模型中,供体接受粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)和干细胞因子(SCF)联合治疗后,异基因外周血祖细胞移植的抗白血病活性增强。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2003 Jul;32(1):49-56. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1704072.
5
A pilot study of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation using related donors stimulated with G-CSF.一项使用粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)刺激的相关供体进行异基因骨髓移植的初步研究。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 1997 Dec;20(12):1033-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1701029.
6
Comparison between once a day vs twice a day G-CSF for mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) in normal donors for allogeneic PBPC transplantation.对于异基因外周血祖细胞移植的正常供者,比较每日一次与每日两次使用粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)动员外周血祖细胞(PBPC)的效果。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 1998 Jul;22(1):39-45. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1701293.
7
Reduced risk of acute GVHD following mobilization of HLA-identical sibling donors with GM-CSF alone.单独使用粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子动员 HLA 相合同胞供者后,急性移植物抗宿主病风险降低。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2005 Sep;36(6):531-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705091.
8
Use of concurrent G-CSF + GM-CSF vs G-CSF alone for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in children with malignant disease.
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2000 Aug;26(4):365-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1702523.
9
Long-term engraftment, graft-vs.-host disease, and immunologic reconstitution after experimental transplantation of allogeneic peripheral blood cells from G-CSF-treated donors.来自粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)处理供体的异基因外周血细胞实验性移植后的长期植入、移植物抗宿主病和免疫重建
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 1996 Oct;2(3):126-33.
10
Allogeneic transplantation of G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood stem cells from unrelated donors: a retrospective analysis.非亲缘供者粒细胞集落刺激因子动员的外周血干细胞异体移植:一项回顾性分析。
Haematologica. 2000 Aug;85(8):839-47.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost structure and clinical outcome of a stem cell transplantation program in a developing country: the experience in northeast Mexico.发展中国家干细胞移植项目的成本结构与临床结果:墨西哥东北部的经验
Oncologist. 2015 Apr;20(4):386-92. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0218. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
2
The costs and cost-effectiveness of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation versus bone marrow transplantation in pediatric patients with acute leukemia.异基因外周血造血干细胞移植与骨髓移植治疗儿童急性白血病的成本效果分析。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010 Sep;16(9):1272-81. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2010.03.016. Epub 2010 Mar 27.