Suppr超能文献

基于靶控输注的麻醉与标准麻醉方案的成本分析。

Cost analysis of target-controlled infusion-based anesthesia compared with standard anesthesia regimens.

作者信息

Suttner S, Boldt J, Schmidt C, Piper S, Kumle B

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Universität Mainz, Ludwigshafen, Germany.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 1999 Jan;88(1):77-82. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199901000-00015.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

With the development of new computer-assisted target-controlled infusion (TCI) systems and the availability of short-acting anesthetics, total IV anesthesia (TIVA) has become increasingly popular. The aim of this study was to compare costs of TCI-based anesthesia with two standard anesthesia regimens. Sixty patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly divided into three groups. Group 1 (TIVA/TCI) received TIVA using a propofol-based TCI system and continuous administration of remifentanil; Group 2 (isoflurane) underwent inhaled anesthesia with isoflurane, fentanyl, and N2O; Group 3 (standard propofol) received fentanyl and N2O and a continuous infusion of propofol using a standard delivery system. Maintenance doses for anesthetics were adjusted according to the patient's need. Isoflurane consumption was measured by weighing the vaporizer by using a precision weighing machine. Duration of surgery and of anesthesia was similar in the three groups. Time from stopping administration of anesthetics until tracheal extubation (6+/-2 min) and stay in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU; 70+/-12 min) were shorter in Group 1 than in the Groups 2 (15+/-3 and 87+/-13 min, respectively) and 3 (10+/-4 and 81+/-14 min, respectively) (P < 0.05). Episodes of postoperative nausea and vomiting in the PACU and on the surgical ward were less common in Group 1 than in the other two groups. Intraoperative costs were higher in Group 1 ($62.19/patient; $0.55/min of anesthesia) than in Groups 2 ($16.97/patient; $0.13/min of anesthesia) and 3 ($34.68/patient; $0.32/min of anesthesia). Cost for discarded anesthetic drugs accounted for almost 18% of total intraoperative costs in Group 1. We conclude that TIVA/TCI anesthesia using propofol/remifentanil was associated with the highest intraoperative costs but the fewest postoperative side effects. An overall cost-effectiveness analysis of new anesthetic regimens must balance the direct cost of anesthetics and beneficial effects leading to improved patients' comfort.

IMPLICATIONS

In today's climate of cost-consciousness, careful economic evaluation of new anesthetic regimens is necessary. A target-controlled infusion (TCI)-based total IV anesthesia (TIVA) regimen using propofol and remifentanil was compared with a standard propofol anesthesia regimen and an inhaled anesthetic technique using isoflurane. Target-controlled infusion/total IV anesthesia was associated with the largest intraoperative costs but allowed the most rapid recovery from anesthesia, was associated with fewest postoperative side effects, and permitted earlier discharge from the postanesthesia care unit.

摘要

未标注

随着新型计算机辅助靶控输注(TCI)系统的发展以及短效麻醉剂的可得性,全静脉麻醉(TIVA)越来越受欢迎。本研究的目的是比较基于TCI的麻醉与两种标准麻醉方案的成本。60例行择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者被随机分为三组。第1组(TIVA/TCI)使用基于丙泊酚的TCI系统进行TIVA并持续输注瑞芬太尼;第2组(异氟烷)采用异氟烷、芬太尼和N₂O进行吸入麻醉;第3组(标准丙泊酚)接受芬太尼和N₂O,并使用标准给药系统持续输注丙泊酚。根据患者需求调整麻醉维持剂量。通过使用精密称重机称量蒸发器来测量异氟烷消耗量。三组的手术时间和麻醉时间相似。第1组从停止使用麻醉剂到气管拔管的时间(6±2分钟)和在麻醉后恢复室(PACU)的停留时间(共70±12分钟)比第2组(分别为15±3分钟和87±13分钟)和第3组(分别为10±4分钟和81±14分钟)短(P<0.05)。第1组在PACU和外科病房术后恶心呕吐的发生率低于其他两组。第1组的术中成本(62.19美元/患者;0.55美元/分钟麻醉时间)高于第2组(16.97美元/患者;0.13美元/分钟麻醉时间)和第3组(34.68美元/患者;0.32美元/分钟麻醉时间)。第1组废弃麻醉药物的成本几乎占术中总成本的18%。我们得出结论,使用丙泊酚/瑞芬太尼的TIVA/TCI麻醉术中成本最高,但术后副作用最少。对新的麻醉方案进行全面的成本效益分析必须权衡麻醉剂的直接成本和能提高患者舒适度的有益效果。

启示

在当今注重成本的环境下,对新的麻醉方案进行仔细的经济评估是必要的。将使用丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼的基于靶控输注(TCI)的全静脉麻醉(TIVA)方案与标准丙泊酚麻醉方案和使用异氟烷的吸入麻醉技术进行了比较。靶控输注/全静脉麻醉术中成本最高,但麻醉恢复最快,术后副作用最少,并允许更早从麻醉后恢复室出院。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验