Koppert W, Likar R, Geisslinger G, Zeck S, Schmelz M, Sittl R
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany.
Anesth Analg. 1999 Jan;88(1):117-22.
The objective of this study was to evaluate direct peripheral analgesic effects of morphine using a peripheral model of hyperalgesia and the technique of IV regional anesthesia (IVRA), thus allowing the differentiation between central and peripheral mechanisms of action. Two spots on the ventral sides of both forearms in 12 volunteers were irradiated with ultraviolet (UV)-B to induce thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia. One day after the induction of the inflammatory reaction, 40 mL of morphine hydrochloride 0.01% was administered via IVRA. Calibrated heat and phasic mechanical stimuli were applied to differentially determine impairments of tactile and nociceptive perception. Touch and phasic mechanical stimuli of noxious intensity to normal skin did not reveal altered responsiveness caused by morphine. In contrast, the administration of morphine significantly increased heat pain thresholds in the UV-B-pretreated skin areas. The peripheral antihyperalgesic effects of morphine were demonstrated only in inflamed skin areas. Direct central analgesic effects were ruled out by the lack of measurable plasma concentrations of morphine and its metabolites. Morphine 0.01% significantly diminished thermal, but not mechanical, hyperalgesia by a peripheral mode of action, which suggests inhibition of effector pathways leading to heat, but not mechanical, sensitization.
The peripheral analgesic effects of morphine were studied using modified IV regional anesthesia. When administered 1 day after the induction of dermal inflammation, morphine 0.01% diminished heat, but not primary mechanical, hyperalgesia. Therefore, suppression of mechanical hyperalgesia seen in previous studies could be predominantly due to inhibition of secondary (central) mechanical hyperalgesia.
本研究的目的是使用痛觉过敏的外周模型和静脉区域麻醉(IVRA)技术评估吗啡的直接外周镇痛作用,从而区分中枢和外周作用机制。对12名志愿者双侧前臂腹侧的两个部位进行紫外线(UV)-B照射,以诱导热痛觉过敏和机械痛觉过敏。在炎症反应诱导1天后,通过IVRA给予40 mL 0.01%的盐酸吗啡。应用校准的热刺激和相位机械刺激来分别确定触觉和伤害性感知的损伤情况。对正常皮肤施加无害强度的触摸和相位机械刺激未发现吗啡引起的反应性改变。相反,吗啡给药显著提高了UV-B预处理皮肤区域的热痛阈值。吗啡的外周抗痛觉过敏作用仅在炎症皮肤区域得到证实。由于未检测到血浆中吗啡及其代谢物的浓度,排除了直接的中枢镇痛作用。0.01%的吗啡通过外周作用模式显著减轻了热痛觉过敏,但未减轻机械痛觉过敏,这表明其抑制了导致热敏感而非机械敏感的效应通路。
使用改良的静脉区域麻醉研究了吗啡的外周镇痛作用。在皮肤炎症诱导1天后给药时,0.01%的吗啡减轻了热痛觉过敏,但未减轻原发性机械痛觉过敏。因此,先前研究中所见的机械痛觉过敏抑制可能主要归因于继发性(中枢)机械痛觉过敏的抑制。