Bickel A, Dorfs S, Schmelz M, Forster C, Uhl W, Handwerker O H
Department of Physiology I, University of Erlangen/Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany Merck KGaA, 64271 Darmstadt, Germany.
Pain. 1998 Jun;76(3):317-325. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(98)00062-1.
In a double-blind, cross-over study, ibuprofen (600 mg), a peripherally-acting selective kappa-opioid receptor agonist (7.5 mg), or placebo were given orally in experiments on healthy volunteers 1 h before assessment of pain thresholds to radiant heat and of pain ratings to controlled mechanical impact stimuli. Mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia had been induced 24 h before by irradiating skin patches on the ventral side of the upper leg. UVB irradiation induced mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia at radiation dosages of three times the minimal erythema dose. UVA irradiation resulted in an immediate erythema and a delayed tanning of the skin, however, no hyperalgesia was observed. For comparison another model of mechanical hyperalgesia was applied in the same experiments which has been previously proven sensitive to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). In this model hyperalgesia was assessed, which develops during repetitive pinching of skin folds (pinch model). Ibuprofen significantly diminished heat and mechanical hyperalgesia induced by UVB, but had no effect on pain responses obtained from untreated skin. It also had an antihyperalgesic effect in the pinch stimulus paradigm. In contrast, the kappa-agonist showed no antihyperalgesic efficacy in the chosen models. It is concluded that the UVB model, as the pinch model, is suitable for establishing antihyperalgesic effects of NSAIDs, but probably not of kappa-receptor agonists, in healthy human volunteers. Compared to the pinch stimulus model, the UVB model offers additional advantages: (a) drugs may be tested after induction of the skin trauma by UV and this situation is more similar to the clinical use of antihyperalgesic drugs. (b) Since mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia is induced by UVB, drug effects can be tested upon both forms of hyperalgesia.
在一项双盲、交叉研究中,在对健康志愿者进行辐射热痛阈和控制性机械冲击刺激疼痛评分评估前1小时,口服布洛芬(600毫克)、外周作用选择性κ-阿片受体激动剂(7.5毫克)或安慰剂。在实验前24小时,通过照射大腿前侧的皮肤贴片诱发机械性和热痛觉过敏。紫外线B照射在三倍于最小红斑剂量的辐射剂量下诱发机械性和热痛觉过敏。紫外线A照射导致皮肤立即出现红斑和延迟晒黑,然而,未观察到痛觉过敏。为了进行比较,在同一实验中应用了另一种先前已证明对非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)敏感的机械性痛觉过敏模型。在该模型中,评估在重复捏皮肤褶皱(捏模型)过程中产生的痛觉过敏。布洛芬显著减轻了紫外线B诱发的热和机械性痛觉过敏,但对未处理皮肤的疼痛反应没有影响。它在捏刺激范式中也具有抗痛觉过敏作用。相比之下,κ-激动剂在所选模型中未显示出抗痛觉过敏功效。得出的结论是,紫外线B模型与捏模型一样,适用于在健康人类志愿者中确立NSAIDs的抗痛觉过敏作用,但可能不适用于κ-受体激动剂。与捏刺激模型相比,紫外线B模型具有额外的优势:(a)可以在紫外线诱发皮肤创伤后测试药物,这种情况更类似于抗痛觉过敏药物的临床应用。(b)由于紫外线B诱发机械性和热痛觉过敏,可以对两种痛觉过敏形式测试药物效果。