Chandhoke P S, DeAntoni E
Division of Surgery (Urology), University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver 80262, USA.
J Endourol. 1998 Dec;12(6):485-91. doi: 10.1089/end.1998.12.485.
A literature review was conducted on the application of economic analysis to clinical medicine, particularly urology. The surgical management of urolithiasis and the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction were used as specific disease examples to evaluate how cost-effectiveness analysis has been used to address the clinical concerns of practicing urologists. As the costs and outcomes of the treatment of kidney stone disease and ureteropelvic junction obstruction can be specifically defined, the application of cost-effectiveness analysis in these two areas meets most standards of economic analysis. Economic models that incorporate poor assumptions, incomplete data, or both are unlikely to have significant clinical utility. The most useful models are those that are structurally simple and evaluate healthcare program alternatives from the patient's, provider's, or society's perspective.
针对经济分析在临床医学,尤其是泌尿外科中的应用进行了文献综述。以尿石症的外科治疗和肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的治疗作为具体疾病实例,来评估成本效益分析是如何用于解决泌尿外科临床医生所关注的问题的。由于肾结石疾病和肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的治疗成本和结果能够得到明确界定,成本效益分析在这两个领域的应用符合经济分析的大多数标准。包含错误假设、不完整数据或两者皆有的经济模型不太可能具有显著的临床实用性。最有用的模型是那些结构简单且从患者、医疗服务提供者或社会的角度评估医疗保健方案选择的模型。