Cobb N W, Kula K S, Phillips C, Proffit W R
Department of Orthodontics, University of North Carolina, School of Dentistry, Chapel Hill 27599-7450, USA.
Clin Orthod Res. 1998 Aug;1(1):12-9. doi: 10.1111/ocr.1998.1.1.12.
In a clinical trial involving 155 dental arches with irregularity > 5 mm, the rate of alignment was used to compare the alignment efficiency of 16 mil superelastic Ni-Ti versus 17.5 mil triple-stranded steel archwires, and to determine whether ion implantation of the Ni-Ti wire improved its performance. Subjects were randomly assigned to archwire types; both 18 and 22 slot edgewise appliances were employed. Pre-treatment equivalence of the experimental groups was verified. Anterior irregularity was determined monthly (using Little's irregularity index) until it decreased below 2 mm, and the elastomeric ligatures were replaced at each appointment. Effective tooth movement occurred with each of the archwire types. There were no significant differences among wires, but the rate of alignment was significantly faster in the lower arch for subjects with the 22 slot appliance.
在一项涉及155个牙弓不规则度大于5毫米的临床试验中,采用排齐率来比较16密耳超弹性镍钛丝与17.5密耳三股钢丝弓丝的排齐效率,并确定镍钛丝的离子植入是否改善了其性能。受试者被随机分配到弓丝类型组;同时使用了18槽和22槽的方丝弓矫治器。验证了实验组治疗前的等效性。每月(使用利特尔不规则指数)测定前牙不规则度,直至其降至2毫米以下,每次就诊时更换弹性结扎圈。每种弓丝类型都能实现有效的牙齿移动。不同弓丝之间没有显著差异,但使用22槽矫治器的受试者在下牙弓中的排齐速度明显更快。