Sikirić P, Seiwerth S, Desković S, Grabarević Z, Marović A, Rucman R, Petek M, Konjevoda P, Jadrijević S, Sosa T, Perović D, Aralica G, Turković B
Center for Digestive Diseases, Medical and Veterinary Faculty, University of Zagreb, Croatia.
Eur J Pharmacol. 1999 Jan 1;364(1):23-31. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(98)00818-8.
Adaptive cytoprotection in the stomach was originally defined by applying the exogenous irritants only. The contribution of endogenous irritants as inductors of initial lesions was not specially evaluated. No attempt was made to either focus antiulcer agent activity on adaptive cytoprotection, or split their 'cytoprotection' into complex adaptive cytoprotective activity and simple cytoprotective effects. Agents had so far not been applied simultaneously with the second challenge with ethanol (or irritant), when differences between cytoprotection and adaptive cytoprotection appear. Gastrojejunal anastomosis for 24 h in rats was introduced as new model for analyzing cytoprotection/adaptive cytoprotection. The contribution of the up-normal level of endogenous irritants and the endogenous small irritant-induced minor lesions during the adaptive cytoprotection were studied. The effect of late challenge with 96% ethanol in the presence of an up-normal level of endogenous irritants and endogenous small irritant-induced minor lesions was compared with results of classic studies of ethanol-induced gastric lesions in normal rats (1 ml/rat i.g.). Antiulcer agents or a prostaglandins-synthesis inhibitor, indomethacin, given once only in classic studies, were given at several points during injury induction: (i) surgery, (ii) mild ethanol, (iii) strong ethanol, (iv) strong ethanol applied after a suitable period following either mild ethanol or surgery). Their effects were compared in rats treated as follows: exogenous irritant studies (96% or 20% ethanol), exogenous/exogenous irritant studies (20% ethanol 1 h before 96% ethanol), endogenous irritant studies (gastrojejunal anastomosis for 24 h), and endogenous/exogenous irritant studies (gastrojejunal anastomosis for 24 h before 96% ethanol). Characteristic of the various irritants differed: the (preceding) small irritants (exogenous (i.e., mild ethanol in healthy intact rats) (exogenous irritant studies) vs. endogenous (e.g., (increased) gastric acid secretion, duodenal reflux in gastric content in rats with termino-lateral gastrojejunal anastomosis) (endogenous irritant studies)). These factors caused modifications of agents' activities not, as initially thought, giving simple 'cytoprotection', but being only cytoprotective, or adaptive cytoprotective, or both cytoprotective and adaptive cytoprotective. Atropine (10 mg/kg i.p.) and ranitidine (10 mg) had only cytoprotective activity (exogenous irritant-studies), whereas pentadecapeptide BPC157 (10 microg or 10 ng), and omeprazole (10 mg) had mainly adaptive cytoprotective activity (endogenous/exogenous irritant studies) or both cytoprotective and adaptive cytoprotective activities (exogenous/exogenous irritant studies). Augmentation of the lesions by indomethacin (5 mg/kg s.c.), showed that only events preceding the late challenge with ethanol may be prostaglandin-dependent in both models. The second, adaptive cytoprotective part, seen after late ethanol challenge, may be either prostaglandin-dependent (exogenous/exogenous irritant studies) or non-dependent (endogenous/exogenous irritant studies). Both spontaneous lesion reduction, as an essential mechanism of adaptive cytoprotection, and the further lesion reduction by agents, such as pentadecapeptide BPC 157 and omeprazole, suggests that these agents function as an essential link between the various reactions in cytoprotection/adaptive cytoprotection.
胃内的适应性细胞保护最初仅通过施加外源性刺激物来定义。内源性刺激物作为初始损伤诱导因素的作用未得到专门评估。既没有尝试将抗溃疡药物的活性集中于适应性细胞保护,也没有将其“细胞保护”分为复杂的适应性细胞保护活性和简单的细胞保护作用。当细胞保护和适应性细胞保护之间出现差异时,尚未同时使用乙醇(或刺激物)进行第二次刺激来应用药物。将大鼠胃空肠吻合24小时作为分析细胞保护/适应性细胞保护的新模型。研究了内源性刺激物水平升高以及适应性细胞保护过程中内源性小刺激物诱导的轻微损伤的作用。将内源性刺激物水平升高和内源性小刺激物诱导的轻微损伤存在时96%乙醇的晚期刺激效果与正常大鼠(1毫升/只,腹腔注射)乙醇诱导胃损伤的经典研究结果进行了比较。在经典研究中仅给药一次的抗溃疡药物或前列腺素合成抑制剂吲哚美辛,在损伤诱导的几个时间点给药:(i)手术时,(ii)轻度乙醇刺激后,(iii)强烈乙醇刺激后,(iv)在轻度乙醇或手术后适当时间后给予强烈乙醇刺激后)。在以下处理的大鼠中比较了它们的效果:外源性刺激物研究(96%或20%乙醇)、外源性/外源性刺激物研究(96%乙醇前1小时给予20%乙醇)、内源性刺激物研究(胃空肠吻合24小时)和内源性/外源性刺激物研究(96%乙醇前胃空肠吻合24小时)。各种刺激物的特点不同:(先前的)小刺激物(外源性(即健康完整大鼠中的轻度乙醇)(外源性刺激物研究)与内源性(例如,胃酸分泌增加、端侧胃空肠吻合大鼠胃内容物中的十二指肠反流)(内源性刺激物研究))。这些因素导致药物活性发生改变,并非如最初所想的那样产生简单的“细胞保护”,而只是具有细胞保护作用,或适应性细胞保护作用,或兼具细胞保护和适应性细胞保护作用。阿托品(10毫克/千克,腹腔注射)和雷尼替丁(10毫克)仅具有细胞保护活性(外源性刺激物研究),而十五肽BPC157(10微克或10纳克)和奥美拉唑(10毫克)主要具有适应性细胞保护活性(内源性/外源性刺激物研究)或兼具细胞保护和适应性细胞保护活性(外源性/外源性刺激物研究)。吲哚美辛(5毫克/千克,皮下注射)使损伤加重,表明在两种模型中,仅乙醇晚期刺激之前的事件可能依赖前列腺素。乙醇晚期刺激后出现的第二个适应性细胞保护部分,可能依赖前列腺素(外源性/外源性刺激物研究)或不依赖前列腺素(内源性/外源性刺激物研究)。作为适应性细胞保护的基本机制的自发损伤减轻以及十五肽BPC 157和奥美拉唑等药物进一步减轻损伤,表明这些药物在细胞保护/适应性细胞保护的各种反应之间起到了关键联系作用。